Gemini 2.5 Pro

The Conversational AI Voice Market: A Strategic Analysis for Symphony42

Executive Summary

The Conversational AI market is undergoing a period of explosive growth and fundamental transformation. This report provides a strategic analysis of the AI Voice Agent ecosystem, focusing on key vendors and actionable recommendations for Symphony42. The global Conversational AI market, valued at approximately $12.24 billion in 2024, is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of around 23%.¹ However, the more specific AI Voice Agent segment, which these vendors target, is experiencing a much faster expansion, estimated at $2.4 billion in 2024 with a remarkable 34.8% CAGR.⁴ This indicates that voice is the premier growth frontier within the broader AI landscape.

Three key trends define this dynamic market. First is the relentless pursuit of sub-500-millisecond latency to eliminate perceptible delays and achieve truly human-like conversational fluency.⁶ Second is a strategic schism dividing the market into three camps: best-in-class component specialists (e.g., Eleven Labs), developer-focused orchestration platforms (e.g., Retell AI, Vapi), and vertically integrated infrastructure players (e.g., Bland AI, LiveKit). Third is the emergence of disruptive, single-model architectures (e.g., Sesame) that threaten to upend the current multi-component technology stack.⁸

Symphony42's current stack, comprising Retell AI, Eleven Labs, and LiveKit, represents a sophisticated, best-of-breed approach. However, this analysis reveals significant strategic risks, including potential cost inefficiencies due to vendor overlaps and a moderate-to-high degree of vendor lock-in.

The primary recommendation is for Symphony42 to critically evaluate its current architecture for redundancies. The strategic imperative is to decide whether to (1) rationalize the stack by building orchestration logic directly on its existing LiveKit infrastructure, thereby reducing vendor dependency and cost, or (2) consolidate onto a single, more flexible orchestration platform like Vapi to simplify development and accelerate time-to-market. This report provides a detailed 90-day action plan to guide this critical decision-making process.

The Conversational AI Voice Ecosystem: A Technology Primer

To make informed strategic decisions, it is essential to understand the underlying technology that powers a conversational AI voice agent. While technically complex, the process can be simplified into a seven-layer technology stack. Each layer performs a distinct function, and vendors differentiate themselves by specializing in one or more of these layers. Understanding this stack provides a non-technical framework for evaluating vendor capabilities and market positioning.

The journey of a single conversational turn—from a user speaking to an AI responding—flows through these seven layers:

1. Connectivity & Telephony: This is the foundational layer that establishes the communication channel, connecting a user's phone call via the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or a web client via the internet to the AI system using protocols like Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) or WebRTC.¹⁰
2. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR): This layer functions as the system's "ears." It captures the raw audio stream from the user and converts the spoken words into machine-readable text, creating a transcript for the AI to process.¹³
3. Natural Language Understanding (NLU): This is the first part of the system's "brain." It analyzes the transcribed text to interpret the user's meaning and intent, moving beyond a literal word-for-word translation to grasp the underlying goal of the query.¹⁶
4. AI Logic & Reasoning (LLM): This is the core cognitive engine. Typically a Large Language Model (LLM), this layer takes the user's intent, accesses external data sources or tools (like a CRM or calendar), formulates a logical response, and decides on the next action.¹⁹
5. Text-to-Speech (TTS): This layer acts as the system's "mouth." It takes the text-based response generated by the LLM and synthesizes it into natural-sounding, human-like audio, complete with appropriate tone, pace, and intonation.²¹
6. Orchestration: This is the "central nervous system" of the entire operation. It manages the real-time, bidirectional flow of data between all other layers, maintains the context of the conversation, intelligently handles interruptions (barge-in), and ensures the entire interaction feels seamless and coherent.²⁴
7. Compliance & Security: This is an essential, overarching layer that governs the entire process. It ensures that all data, particularly sensitive personal information, is handled securely and in accordance with regulations like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and SOC 2 standards.²⁷

The primary battlegrounds in the current market are not evenly distributed across this stack. The capabilities of ASR and basic TTS are rapidly becoming commoditized, with many high-quality options available. The most intense areas of competition and innovation, where vendors are investing heavily to differentiate, are Latency, Orchestration, and AI Logic. Reducing latency across every layer is paramount for creating natural, fluid conversations.⁶ Improving orchestration is key to managing more complex, multi-turn dialogues and handling interruptions gracefully. Enhancing the AI logic layer enables agents to move beyond simple Q&A to perform complex, multi-step tasks, a capability often referred to as "agentic" behavior. For Symphony42, this framework is critical for vendor evaluation. A provider like Eleven Labs is a world-class specialist in Layer 5 (TTS), while Retell AI specializes in Layer 6 (Orchestration). Understanding these specializations is key to deconstructing your current stack and identifying both its strengths and its hidden risks.

Vendor Deep Dives: Profiles of Key Market Players

This section provides an in-depth analysis of the six companies central to this report. Each profile examines the company's strategic positioning, technological capabilities, and market traction, providing the context needed for comparative analysis.

Bland AI

• Company Overview: Founded in 2023 and headquartered in San Francisco, Bland AI has rapidly emerged with the ambitious vision of becoming "the enterprise platform for AI phone calls".³⁰ The company targets high-volume, repetitive call center tasks such as customer support, sales, and appointment setting, aiming to make these interactions more efficient and cost-effective.³⁰
• Funding & Investors: Bland AI has demonstrated remarkable fundraising velocity, progressing from pre-seed to a $40 million Series B in under 10 months, bringing its total funding to $65 million.³⁴ This rapid ascent is backed by prominent investors, including

Y Combinator, Scale Venture Partners, and Emergence Capital.³²

• Core Offering: Bland AI is pursuing a strategy of vertical integration. It claims to have built and hosted its own proprietary infrastructure for transcription (ASR), inference (LLM), and text-to-speech (TTS).²⁹ This end-to-end control is designed to deliver superior performance, security, and stability by reducing reliance on third-party models. A key feature is its "Conversational Pathways" builder, a Zapier-style, low-code interface that allows non-technical users to design and manage complex call flows.³⁰
• Latency & Multilingual Support: The company's marketing materials claim "sub-1 second latency" and the ability for its agents to "speak any language".²⁹ However, independent analyses and competitor benchmarks present a more nuanced picture, with some sources reporting average latency between 800ms and 3 seconds.³⁷ Similarly, multilingual support is described by some as being primarily English-focused, with broader language capabilities reserved for enterprise clients at an additional cost.³⁷ The development of their "Bland Babel" transcription technology, which is designed to handle real-time language identification and code-switching, indicates that advanced multilingual support is a key area of active R&D.⁴⁰
• Pricing: Bland AI offers a straightforward and transparent pay-as-you-go pricing model, charging $0.09 per minute of active call time.⁴¹
• Notable Customers: Bland AI lists major enterprises such as Sears and Better.com as clients, validating its focus on the enterprise market.³⁰ Other customers mentioned include Parade and MonsterRG.²⁹

Bland AI's strategy represents a high-risk, high-reward bet on vertical integration. By developing its own full stack of AI models, the company aims to achieve two critical long-term advantages over competitors who merely orchestrate third-party services. First, by controlling every component, it can deeply optimize the interactions between them, co-locating models to minimize network hops and fine-tuning them to work in concert, which theoretically leads to lower latency and a more seamless user experience. Second, by owning the infrastructure, Bland AI can drive its marginal cost per call towards zero for high-volume enterprise clients, creating a powerful economic moat.²⁹ However, this strategy is fraught with risk. It pits Bland AI's internal R&D teams directly against hyper-specialized, heavily funded market leaders like Eleven Labs in TTS and OpenAI in LLMs. The danger is that their proprietary models may struggle to keep pace with the quality and feature velocity of the best-of-breed alternatives, potentially resulting in a product that is cheaper but technologically inferior. The conflicting reports on latency and language support suggest that Bland AI is still in the process of fully realizing its ambitious vertically integrated vision.

Eleven Labs

• Company Overview: Founded in 2022 with headquarters in New York City, Eleven Labs has established itself as the market leader in generative voice AI.⁴³ Its mission is to "make content universally accessible in any language or voice" by developing the most realistic, versatile, and contextually-aware AI audio models.⁴⁴
• Funding & Investors: Eleven Labs is a dominant force in the market from a funding perspective, having raised a total of $281 million.⁴⁵ Its most recent funding was a $180 million Series C round in January 2025, which tripled its valuation to

$3.3 billion.⁴⁶ The company is backed by a premier roster of venture capital firms, including

Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Iconiq Growth, Sequoia Capital, and Salesforce Ventures, signifying strong investor confidence in its technology and market position.⁴⁷

• Core Offering: The company's core product is a best-in-class Text-to-Speech (TTS) engine, renowned for its realism and emotional range, and a sophisticated voice cloning tool.⁴³ While it began as a component provider, Eleven Labs is strategically expanding its offerings to become a full-fledged "Conversational AI" platform. It now provides its own Speech-to-Text (STT) and orchestration capabilities, positioning itself to compete directly with the platforms that have historically been its largest customers.³⁹
• Latency & Multilingual Support: Eleven Labs demonstrates exceptional performance in both latency and language support. Using its "Flash" models via a websocket connection, it can achieve a time-to-first-byte (TTFB) of approximately 150-200ms in the US and Europe.⁵¹ An independent benchmark measured its average end-to-end latency in the US at a competitive 350ms.⁵² The platform offers extensive support for

29+ languages, providing high-quality, emotionally rich voices across its library.⁵⁰

• Pricing: Eleven Labs utilizes a tiered subscription model that includes Free, Starter, Creator, and Pro plans, supplemented with usage-based pricing for character generation beyond the plan limits.⁴² Custom enterprise plans are available for high-volume users.
• Notable Customers: As a key enabling technology, Eleven Labs is the "voice" behind many other platforms in the ecosystem, with customers including Synthflow and Retell AI.⁵⁴ Its technology is also used by major media companies, game developers, and creators such as

TIME Magazine, Paradox Interactive, Chess.com, and Rabbit.⁵⁴

Eleven Labs' strategic evolution from a component specialist to a full-stack platform introduces a significant dilemma for the entire ecosystem. Having established market dominance as the premier "Intel Inside" for high-quality TTS, many orchestration platforms like Retell and Vapi built their products by integrating Eleven Labs' voices to attract customers. This created a dependency where the perceived quality of the final agent was inextricably linked to the Eleven Labs brand. Now, by launching its own orchestration services, Eleven Labs is beginning to compete directly with its biggest channel partners. This forces customers like Symphony42 into a difficult strategic position, prompting the question: "Is our orchestration provider a reliable long-term partner, or are they merely a reseller for a component company that will eventually become their direct competitor?" This dynamic introduces long-term risk and underscores the importance of owning or controlling the most critical layers of the technology stack.

LiveKit

• Company Overview: Founded in 2021 and based in the San Francisco Bay Area, LiveKit originated as an open-source project designed to solve the complex challenge of building scalable, low-latency, real-time audio and video applications using WebRTC.⁵⁷
• Funding & Investors: LiveKit has raised a total of $83 million, including a $45 million Series B round in April 2025 at a $345 million valuation.⁶⁰ Its investor base is heavily weighted towards infrastructure and AI experts, including lead investors

Altimeter Capital and Redpoint Ventures, as well as prominent angel investors such as Jeff Dean (Head of Google AI), Guillermo Rauch (CEO of Vercel), and Mati Staniszewski (CEO of Eleven Labs).⁵⁷

• Core Offering: LiveKit provides a complete, open-source stack for real-time communications. Its core products include a highly scalable Selective Forwarding Unit (SFU) media server, client SDKs for all major web and mobile platforms, and the LiveKit Agents framework, a powerful toolkit for developing multimodal AI agents.¹¹ For businesses that prefer a managed solution, the company offers

LiveKit Cloud, which handles the hosting, scaling, and operational complexity of the infrastructure.⁵⁷

• Latency & Multilingual Support: The company's entire value proposition is centered on performance. It is engineered to deliver ultra-low, sub-100-millisecond global latency, which is critical for real-time, interactive AI applications.⁶⁴ As a foundational infrastructure layer, LiveKit is agnostic to language; multilingual capabilities are determined by the specific ASR, LLM, and TTS services that a developer chooses to integrate on top of the LiveKit framework.
• Pricing: The open-source LiveKit stack is free to download and self-host. LiveKit Cloud operates on a usage-based pricing model with a generous free tier, making it accessible for developers to start building, and offers custom enterprise plans.¹²
• Notable Customers: LiveKit's infrastructure is trusted by some of the most demanding AI companies in the world. Its most prominent customer is OpenAI, which uses LiveKit to power the ChatGPT Voice Mode.⁶⁰ Other notable users include

Spotify, Oracle, Reddit, Character.ai, and even its direct competitor, Retell AI, which leverages LiveKit for its underlying real-time transport.⁵⁷

LiveKit is not just another voice agent company; it is strategically positioning itself to become the fundamental infrastructure layer for all real-time AI interactions. Its ambition is to be the "AIWS" (AI Web Services)—the "picks and shovels" provider in the gold rush for conversational AI.⁵⁷ This strategy begins with its open-source offering, which addresses the difficult technical problem of building and scaling a reliable WebRTC fabric. By providing a best-in-class solution for free, LiveKit has cultivated a massive developer community of over 100,000, creating a powerful ecosystem effect that establishes its technology as a de facto industry standard.⁶⁵ Its commercial product, LiveKit Cloud, then becomes the simplest and most reliable way to run this standard at enterprise scale. The fact that market-defining companies like OpenAI and even competitors like Retell are paying customers is a powerful validation of this infrastructure-first approach. For Symphony42, choosing LiveKit is a foundational, "close-to-the-metal" decision that offers maximum power, flexibility, and control, at the cost of requiring more in-house development and integration effort compared to an all-in-one platform.

Retell AI

• Company Overview: Founded in 2023 and based in Saratoga, California, Retell AI is a Y Combinator-backed startup focused on supercharging contact center operations with highly capable AI phone agents.⁶⁶
• Funding & Investors: As an early-stage company, Retell AI has raised a total of $5.1 million in seed funding.⁶⁷ Its backers include

Y Combinator, Alt Capital, and a group of influential angel investors, including the CEOs of Box, Runway, and Cal.com.⁶⁹

• Core Offering: Retell AI is a pure-play orchestration platform delivered via a developer-centric API. It is "LLM-first," meaning it focuses on providing deep integrations with leading Large Language Models like OpenAI's GPT-4o to enable sophisticated conversational capabilities, such as dynamic, multi-turn dialogues and reliable function calling to interact with external systems.²⁰ The platform does not build its own foundational models; instead, it orchestrates third-party components for TTS (e.g., ElevenLabs, PlayHT), LLMs (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic), and telephony (e.g., Twilio or bring-your-own-carrier).⁵⁵
• Latency & Multilingual Support: The platform's latency is reported to be approximately 800ms on average.⁷¹ While functional for many use cases, this is higher than the sub-500ms targets of more vertically integrated competitors. It supports over

30 languages, though this requires manual configuration and prompt tuning for each specific use case rather than being an out-of-the-box feature.⁷¹

• Pricing: Retell AI employs a transparent and modular pay-as-you-go pricing model with no platform fees. The cost is broken down into its constituent parts: the conversation engine (~$0.07/min), the chosen LLM (e.g., ~$0.045/min for GPT-4.1), and telephony (~$0.015/min). This allows for clear cost calculation but can become complex to manage.⁷⁰
• Notable Customers: Retell AI has gained significant traction, with over 3,000 businesses using its platform.⁵⁵ Notable customers include

Gifthealth, Everise, Cal.com, Spare, and Respaid, with strong adoption in sectors like healthcare, finance, and B2B sales.⁷³

Retell AI is making a strategic bet that the underlying foundational models (LLM, TTS, ASR) will ultimately become powerful, undifferentiated commodities. In this future, the company believes the most durable value will be created in the orchestration layer—the intelligent "glue" that connects these models to specific business logic and workflows. Their core strategy is to provide the best possible developer experience for this integration task. By tightly coupling its platform with OpenAI's most advanced models like GPT-4o, Retell can offer its customers cutting-edge AI reasoning and function-calling capabilities without the immense capital expenditure of training these models in-house.²⁰ This deep integration is both its greatest strength and its most significant vulnerability. It allows Retell to stay at the forefront of AI capabilities, but it also ties the company's fate—including its performance, feature set, and cost structure—directly to OpenAI's roadmap and pricing. This creates a strategic risk if a competing orchestrator like Vapi offers greater model flexibility, or if a new end-to-end provider like Bland can deliver a more performant and cost-effective integrated solution.

Sesame

• Company Overview: Sesame is a research-centric organization with a formidable team composed of founders from Oculus and senior leaders from Meta, Google, and Apple.⁷⁵ The company has a long-term, ambitious vision: to create "lifelike computers" and personal voice companions, starting with a revolutionary speech model and eventually extending to hardware like lightweight eyewear.⁷⁶
• Funding & Investors: There is no public information available regarding Sesame's funding. However, the high caliber of its founding team and leadership strongly suggests it is well-capitalized through private funding rounds.
• Core Offering: Sesame is not a commercial product company at present. Its core asset is a research initiative centered on its Conversational Speech Model (CSM). The CSM represents a significant architectural departure from the prevailing market standard. Instead of a pipeline of separate ASR, LLM, and TTS models, the CSM is a single, end-to-end multimodal transformer architecture that processes interleaved text and audio inputs to generate a spoken response directly.⁸ The company has open-sourced a 1-billion-parameter version of its base model under an Apache 2.0 license for both research and commercial use.⁷⁸
• Latency & Multilingual Support: The architecture is designed for high performance, with research pointing to the potential for sub-300ms latency.⁸ The current open-source model is primarily optimized for English, but the company has stated plans to expand support to over 20 languages in future releases.⁷⁷
• Pricing: As a research project, there is no commercial pricing. The open-source model is free to use.
• Notable Customers: None, as the company is pre-commercialization.

Sesame is not a vendor for Symphony42 to consider for procurement today. Instead, it represents the most significant potential long-term disruptor in the market and must be monitored closely. Its single-model architecture, if proven successful and scalable, could fundamentally obsolete the current market structure. Today's voice agents rely on a "pipeline" approach, where a conversation is passed between distinct STT, LLM, and TTS services. Each handoff in this chain introduces latency and a potential point of failure or information loss. Sesame's CSM attempts to solve speech generation as a single, holistic task.⁹ The model "hears" the context of the conversation and "speaks" a contextually appropriate response within one unified system. This approach could lead to more natural prosody, better real-time interruption handling, and significantly lower latency, as it eliminates the delays associated with coordinating three separate network calls. Should Sesame successfully commercialize this technology and outperform the established pipeline method, it could force the entire industry to re-architect its solutions. This would pose an existential threat to pure-play orchestrators like Retell and Vapi and introduce a formidable new type of competitor to component specialists like Eleven Labs.

Vapi

• Company Overview: Founded in 2020 as Superpowered, the company pivoted in 2023 to become Vapi, a platform for "Voice AI for developers".⁸⁰ Headquartered in San Francisco, Vapi's mission is to compress the development time for sophisticated voice agents from months to minutes.⁷
• Funding & Investors: Vapi has raised approximately $25 million in total funding. This includes a $20 million Series A round announced in December 2024, which valued the company at $130 million.⁸¹ Its key investors include

Bessemer Venture Partners, Y Combinator, and Abstract Ventures.⁸²

• Core Offering: Vapi is an orchestration platform that competes directly with Retell AI. It differentiates itself through two key strategic choices. First is its emphasis on developer flexibility, embodied by its "bring your own models" philosophy, which allows users to plug in their preferred providers for transcription, LLM, and TTS, or even use their own self-hosted models.⁸⁶ Second is its focus on usability for a broader audience, highlighted by its

"Flow Studio," a no-code, drag-and-drop visual editor for designing conversation flows.⁸⁷

• Latency & Multilingual Support: Vapi claims a highly competitive sub-500-millisecond latency, placing it among the top performers in the market.⁷ It also boasts extensive language capabilities, with support for over

100 languages.⁸⁶

• Pricing: The platform uses a pay-as-you-go model that starts at $0.05 per minute for its core service, with additional costs for telephony and the third-party models selected by the user.⁸⁷ It provides a free tier with a $10 credit to encourage developer experimentation.
• Notable Customers: Vapi has built a large developer community, with over 225,000 developers on its platform.⁸⁶ Its enterprise customers include

Mindtickle, Luma Health, Ellipsis Health, and NY Life, demonstrating its applicability in regulated industries.⁸²

Vapi is strategically positioning itself as the more flexible and user-friendly alternative in the voice orchestration market. Its approach is designed to win not by tying itself to a single best-in-class model, but by providing a more adaptable and accessible platform. The "bring your own model" capability is a crucial differentiator.⁸⁶ It acknowledges the diversity of the market: some customers will always want the latest and greatest LLM from OpenAI, while others may need to optimize for cost with a cheaper model, or for compliance by using a private, self-hosted model. While Retell's deep integration with OpenAI serves the first group well, Vapi's modularity serves all of them. Furthermore, Vapi's inclusion of the "Flow Studio" visual builder directly addresses a key weakness in developer-only platforms.⁸⁷ It broadens the platform's addressable market to include product managers, business analysts, and other less technical stakeholders who need to design and iterate on conversational workflows, a segment that API-first competitors are less equipped to serve. This positions Vapi as a more versatile, "Swiss Army knife" orchestrator that may prove to be a stickier and more defensible platform in the long run.

Comparative Analysis: The Competitive Matrix

To provide a clear, at-a-glance summary of the competitive landscape, the following matrix compares the six vendors across key strategic and technical dimensions. The markers—✅ for strong capability, 🤝 for adequate capability, and ❌ for weak or no capability—are based on the detailed analysis in the preceding section.

Market Opportunity & White-Space Analysis

The Conversational AI Voice market is not a monolithic entity; it is a complex landscape with zones of intense competition and distinct areas of untapped opportunity. Understanding these "red oceans" and "blue oceans" is critical for assessing vendor strategies and Symphony42's own positioning.

Crowded Zones: The Red Ocean of Orchestration

The most fiercely contested area of the market is basic orchestration. The core function of connecting a Speech-to-Text service, a Large Language Model, and a Text-to-Speech service into a functioning voice agent is rapidly becoming a commodity. The presence of two well-funded, fast-moving, and highly similar competitors—Retell AI and Vapi—is clear evidence of this crowded space. Both companies offer developer-focused APIs, pay-as-you-go pricing, and integrations with the same underlying model providers like OpenAI and Eleven Labs. In this environment, differentiation is shifting away from the question of if a platform can orchestrate a call, to how well it does so. The key competitive vectors in this red ocean are now latency, the quality of developer tools, the ease of integration with business systems, and overall cost-effectiveness.

White-Space Opportunities: The Blue Oceans of Differentiation

Despite the competition, several vendors are carving out unique, defensible positions by pursuing distinct strategic paths. These represent the "blue oceans" where sustainable value can be created.

• The End-to-End Performance Play (Bland AI): Bland AI is attempting to create a white space by vertically integrating the entire technology stack.²⁹ The opportunity here is to deliver a fundamentally more performant, secure, and cost-effective product by eliminating dependencies on third-party models. If Bland can achieve lower latency and better coherence than a stitched-together pipeline, while offering a superior cost structure at scale, it could create a highly defensible moat. This is a capital-intensive strategy that requires world-class R&D, but the potential payoff is a dominant market position.
• The Infrastructure Standard Play (LiveKit): LiveKit is pursuing a classic "picks and shovels" strategy by aiming to become the foundational, open-source infrastructure upon which the entire industry builds.⁵⁷ Its white space is not in building the best agent, but in building the best

plumbing for all agents. By open-sourcing its core technology, it fosters massive developer adoption, creating a powerful ecosystem and network effect. Its commercial offering, LiveKit Cloud, then becomes the default, most reliable way to run this industry-standard infrastructure at scale. This is a powerful long-term strategy that builds a deep competitive advantage through community and standardization.

• The Best-in-Class Component Play (Eleven Labs): Eleven Labs has successfully captured a white space by becoming the undisputed quality leader in one critical component of the stack: Text-to-Speech.⁴³ This focus allows it to command premium branding and pricing, becoming the "gold standard" that other platforms integrate to signal quality. The strategic challenge is defending this position against "good enough" alternatives and managing the inherent conflict of expanding into a full platform that competes with its own customers.
• The Flexibility and Usability Play (Vapi): Within the crowded orchestration market, Vapi is creating a white space by focusing on superior flexibility and ease of use. While competitors may focus on a single LLM provider, Vapi's "bring your own model" approach and its no-code "Flow Studio" cater to a much broader set of customer needs—from enterprises with strict compliance requirements to business teams with no coding expertise.⁸⁶ This strategy aims to win not on a single technical benchmark, but on being the most adaptable and accessible platform.
• The Architectural Disruption Play (Sesame): Sesame represents the most profound white-space opportunity: inventing a fundamentally new and better architecture for the problem.⁹ By developing a single multimodal model that replaces the entire ASR-LLM-TTS pipeline, it has the potential to render the current market structure obsolete. This is the highest-risk, highest-reward strategy, as it requires a true research breakthrough, but its success would redefine the entire competitive landscape.

Strategic Review of Symphony42's Current Stack

Symphony42's current technology stack for conversational AI voice agents consists of three distinct vendors: Retell AI for orchestration, Eleven Labs for text-to-speech, and LiveKit for the underlying real-time communication infrastructure. This configuration represents a sophisticated, best-of-breed approach, selecting what are arguably top-tier providers for each layer of the stack. However, a deeper analysis of the interdependencies within this stack reveals significant complexity, potential cost inefficiencies, and a notable level of vendor lock-in risk.

Analysis of Stack Interdependencies and Redundancies

The most critical finding of this analysis is the relationship between Symphony42's chosen vendors. According to public statements and customer testimonials, Retell AI is a customer of LiveKit.⁶⁵ Retell leverages LiveKit's infrastructure to handle the real-time audio transport layer for its own orchestration platform. This creates a scenario where Symphony42, by using both Retell and LiveKit, may be paying for the same underlying infrastructure twice: once through its direct licensing or usage of LiveKit, and a second time indirectly through the fees paid to Retell, which presumably include a markup on their own LiveKit costs.

Furthermore, Retell AI's platform is designed to integrate with various third-party TTS providers, with Eleven Labs being a premium option.⁵⁵ Symphony42's stack, therefore, consists of a specialist component (Eleven Labs) being used by an orchestrator (Retell AI), which is in turn built upon an infrastructure provider (LiveKit) that Symphony42 also uses directly. This multi-layered dependency creates unnecessary complexity and potential points of failure. It is imperative to conduct an immediate internal audit to clarify whether Symphony42's implementation of Retell is running on top of its own managed LiveKit instance or if Retell is using its own separate LiveKit infrastructure.

Vendor Lock-In Analysis

Vendor lock-in measures the difficulty and cost of migrating from one provider to another. A high degree of lock-in can reduce negotiating leverage, limit flexibility, and increase long-term operational risk. The lock-in risk for Symphony42's current stack is assessed as follows (on a scale of 1-Low to 5-High):

• Eleven Labs (TTS): Lock-In Score 2/5
• Rationale: While Eleven Labs is the market leader in voice quality, the technical task of swapping one TTS provider for another is relatively contained. The API endpoints for generating speech are fairly standardized across the industry. Migrating would involve an engineering effort to integrate a new API and potentially re-evaluate voice selection, but it would not require a fundamental re-architecture of the entire system. The primary switching cost is the potential loss of voice quality, not the technical difficulty of the migration itself.
• Retell AI (Orchestration): Lock-In Score 3/5
• Rationale: The orchestration layer is where the "brain" of the voice agent resides. All of Symphony42's business logic, conversational flows, prompt engineering, and integrations with backend systems are configured within Retell's platform. Migrating this logic to a competing orchestrator (like Vapi) or rebuilding it from scratch on a platform like LiveKit would be a significant undertaking. It would require careful extraction and reimplementation of all conversational designs. While not impossible, the effort and risk of business disruption are moderate.
• LiveKit (Infrastructure): Lock-In Score 4/5
• Rationale: As the foundational real-time transport layer, dependency on LiveKit is deep. The entire application's method of handling real-time audio and data streams is built around LiveKit's specific SDKs and architectural patterns. Migrating away from LiveKit would necessitate a complete re-architecture of the core voice application, making it the most "locked-in" part of the current stack. The open-source nature of LiveKit provides a theoretical escape hatch from its managed cloud service (by self-hosting), but the lock-in to its specific technology and protocols remains high.

Mitigation Tactics

To mitigate these identified risks, Symphony42 should consider the following strategic actions:

1. Develop an Architectural Abstraction Layer: Instead of having application code call vendor APIs directly, build a lightweight internal service that acts as an intermediary. This "anti-corruption layer" would expose a standardized internal interface for functions like "generate speech" or "start call." This approach centralizes vendor-specific code, making it significantly easier to swap out a provider in the future with minimal changes to the core application.
2. Enforce Data Portability and Exportability: Mandate that all critical assets built within the Retell platform—including conversation logs, analytics data, agent configurations, and prompt libraries—can be regularly and automatically exported in a structured, usable format (e.g., JSON, CSV). This ensures that the business logic is not held hostage by the platform and can be migrated if necessary.
3. Conduct a Continuous Parallel Proof-of-Concept (PoC): Allocate a small amount of engineering resources (e.g., 10% of one engineer's time) to maintain a running PoC with a direct competitor, such as Vapi. This parallel track should be used to continuously benchmark performance, features, latency, and cost against the incumbent Retell stack. This practice provides a constant, data-driven view of the market, maintains competitive pressure on the current vendor, and significantly de-risks a future migration by having a warm alternative ready.

Actionable Recommendations & 90-Day Roadmap

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the market, vendors, and Symphony42's current technology stack, this section provides a set of ranked, actionable recommendations. Each recommendation is evaluated based on its potential Impact (on product, cost, and long-term strategy), Speed (of implementation), and Cost (in terms of financial and human resources). These recommendations are followed by a concrete 90-day action plan to initiate this strategic evolution.

Strategic Recommendations

The following recommendations are presented in ranked order of strategic priority.

1. PARTNER (Optimize & Rationalize the Current Stack)

• Action: Maintain the multi-vendor, best-of-breed strategy but aggressively rationalize the stack to eliminate redundancies and reduce costs. The highest priority is to resolve the Retell AI and LiveKit overlap. The recommended path is to eliminate the Retell AI platform and leverage the in-house engineering team to rebuild the necessary orchestration logic directly on top of Symphony42's existing LiveKit infrastructure. Continue to partner with Eleven Labs as the preferred TTS component provider.
• Impact: High. This action has the potential for significant cost savings by eliminating a vendor and associated fees. It reduces architectural complexity, decreases vendor dependency, and gives Symphony42 greater control over its core intellectual property (the conversational logic).
• Speed: Medium. This is a substantial engineering project. A dedicated team would likely require 3-6 months to replicate and improve upon the existing functionality currently provided by Retell.
• Cost: Low. While this requires dedicated internal engineering resources, the net financial impact is likely to be a cost saving due to the elimination of Retell's licensing and usage fees.

2. BUY (Consolidate to a New, More Flexible Platform)

• Action: If the engineering effort for Recommendation #1 is deemed too high, the next best option is to consolidate the stack onto a single, more flexible orchestration platform. Conduct a formal, head-to-head "bake-off" between the incumbent, Retell AI, and its primary competitor, Vapi. If Vapi demonstrates superior performance (latency), better tooling (Flow Studio), and greater flexibility (bring-your-own-model), plan a full migration from the current three-vendor stack to Vapi as the sole provider.
• Impact: Medium. This simplifies vendor management from three providers to one, which reduces administrative overhead. It may lead to improved performance and faster development cycles due to better tooling. However, it means abandoning the deep infrastructure control and customization potential offered by managing LiveKit directly.
• Speed: Fast. Platforms like Vapi are designed for rapid deployment. A full migration could realistically be planned and executed within a single business quarter.
• Cost: Medium. This option involves new licensing fees for the chosen platform and the resource costs associated with the migration project.

3. BUILD (Go All-In on Proprietary Infrastructure)

• Action: Commit to a long-term strategy of building a deep, defensible competitive advantage by going all-in on infrastructure. Double down on the investment in LiveKit, using its open-source Agents framework to build a fully proprietary orchestration layer. This approach would transform Symphony42 from a consumer of AI services into a builder of a core AI platform.
• Impact: Very High. This path offers the greatest potential for long-term differentiation. Owning the full orchestration and infrastructure stack provides maximum control over performance, features, security, and cost, creating a durable competitive moat.
• Speed: Slow. This is a significant, multi-year strategic commitment that would require the creation of a dedicated, specialized engineering team focused on real-time AI infrastructure.
• Cost: High. This is the most resource-intensive option, requiring substantial and sustained investment in hiring and retaining top-tier engineering talent.

Next 90-Day Actions Cheat-Sheet

To move from analysis to action, the following cheat-sheet outlines a concrete plan for the next 90 days.

• Phase 1: Audit & Discovery (Weeks 1-4)
• [ ] Task: Conduct a detailed internal architectural review of the current Retell-LiveKit integration.
• Owner: Lead Architect.
• Goal: Produce a definitive data flow diagram and clarify the exact nature of the vendor overlap.
• [ ] Task: Quantify the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for the current three-vendor stack, including all licensing, usage fees, and internal support costs.
• Owner: Finance/Procurement Lead.
• Goal: Establish a precise financial baseline for comparison.
• [ ] Task: Assign a senior engineer to conduct a technical deep-dive on Vapi's API, SDKs, and Flow Studio.
• Owner: Engineering Manager.
• Goal: Assess the feasibility and level of effort required for a potential migration (Recommendation #2).
• [ ] Task: Assign a product manager to actively monitor and report on research developments from Sesame AI.
• Owner: Product Lead.
• Goal: Ensure Symphony42 remains aware of potential long-term architectural disruptions.
• Phase 2: Benchmarking & Proof-of-Concept (Weeks 5-8)
• [ ] Task: Launch a time-boxed, small-scale PoC with Vapi for a single, well-defined use case that is currently handled by Retell.
• Owner: Engineering Team.
• Goal: Generate direct, empirical data comparing the two platforms.
• [ ] Task: Create a formal benchmark report comparing Vapi vs. the current stack on key metrics: end-to-end latency, voice quality (MOS score), developer experience, and cost-per-call.
• Owner: Lead Architect.
• Goal: Provide objective data to inform the strategic decision.
• Phase 3: Strategic Decision & Planning (Weeks 9-12)
• [ ] Task: Hold a strategic review meeting with key stakeholders from Engineering, Product, and Finance.
• Owner: Executive Sponsor.
• Goal: Present the findings from the audit and PoC, and make a formal go/no-go decision on Recommendation #1 (Rationalize) or Recommendation #2 (Consolidate).
• [ ] Task: Based on the decision, develop a detailed project plan for the chosen path.
• Owner: Project Manager.
• Goal: Create a full roadmap with timelines, resource allocation, and defined milestones for Q2/Q3.
• [ ] Task: Present the final analysis, recommendation, and implementation plan to the executive leadership team for final approval and budget allocation.
• Owner: Executive Sponsor.
• Goal: Secure organizational alignment and resources to execute the strategy.

Bibliography

Note: The following bibliography is compiled from the URLs provided in the source material. Full APA-style formatting requires author names and publication dates, which are not consistently available in the provided snippets. The list is formatted to the best extent possible with the available information.

Agarwal, A. (2025, January 30). Bland AI secures $40 million to transform phone calls into seamless experiences. AIM Research. https://aimresearch.co/ai-startups/bland-ai-secures-40-million-to-transform-phone-calls-into-seamless-experiences

AI Agents List. (n.d.). RetellAI. Retrieved from https://aiagentslist.com/agent/retellai

Amazon Web Services. (n.d.). LiveKit. AWS Marketplace. Retrieved from https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-fkryfo4mzfn62

Apple App Store. (2025). ElevenReader: Text to Speech. Retrieved from https://apps.apple.com/us/app/elevenreader-text-to-speech/id6479373050

Ashby. (n.d.). ML Scientist @ Sesame. Retrieved from https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/sesame/376d302f-f870-40aa-940f-aee951803d2b

AssemblyAI. (2025, May 20). What is Automatic Speech Recognition? A Comprehensive Overview of ASR Technology. AssemblyAI Blog. https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/what-is-asr

AssemblyAI. (n.d.). LiveKit for Real-Time Speech-to-Text. AssemblyAI Blog. https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/livekit-realtime-speech-to-text

Biswas, A. (2025, April 11). Sesame Speech Model: How This Viral AI Model Generates Human-Like Speech. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/sesame-speech-model-how-this-viral-ai-model-generates-human-like-speech/

Bland AI. (n.d.). Bland AI | Automate Phone Calls with Conversational AI for Enterprises. Retrieved from https://www.bland.ai/

Bland AI. (n.d.). Bland Babel: Optimizing Real-Time AI Transcription for Multilingual Conversations. Bland AI Blog. https://www.bland.ai/blogs/bland-babel-ai-transcription-optimization

BoringBusinessNerd. (n.d.). LiveKit. Retrieved from https://www.boringbusinessnerd.com/startups/livekit

Botpress. (2024, October 7). What is Natural Language Understanding (NLU)? Botpress Blog. https://botpress.com/blog/what-is-natural-language-understanding-nlu

Center for Data Innovation. (2024, September). 5 Q's for Russell D'Sa, Co-Founder and CEO of LiveKit. https://datainnovation.org/2024/09/5-qs-for-russell-dsa-co-founder-and-ceo-of-livekit/

Crivello, F., & Butler, E. (2025, May 13). Vapi AI Review: Pros, Cons, Comparisons & How It Works. Lindy.ai. https://www.lindy.ai/blog/vapi-ai

Data Bridge Market Research. (2024, October). Global Conversational AI Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis. https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-conversational-ai-market

DigitalOcean. (2025, April 12). An Overview of Sesame’s Conversational Speech Model. DigitalOcean Community. https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/sesame-csm

DuploCloud. (2025, April 1). Retell AI. https://duplocloud.com/company/retell-ai/

ElevenLabs. (n.d.). The most realistic voice AI platform. Retrieved from https://elevenlabs.io/

ElevenLabs. (n.d.). AI for customer service. Retrieved from https://elevenlabs.io/customer-service

ElevenLabs. (n.d.). Best practices: Latency optimization. ElevenLabs Docs. https://elevenlabs.io/docs/best-practices/latency-optimization

ElevenLabs. (n.d.). ElevenLabs vs. Bland.ai. ElevenLabs Blog. https://elevenlabs.io/blog/elevenlabs-vs-blandai

ElevenLabs. (n.d.). Use Cases. Retrieved from https://elevenlabs.io/use-cases

Employbl. (n.d.). LiveKit. Retrieved from https://www.employbl.com/companies/livekit

EquityZen. (n.d.). Invest In LiveKit Stock | Buy Pre-IPO Shares. Retrieved from https://equityzen.com/company/livekit/

Exbo Group. (2025, February 5). Bland Raises a $40M Series B to Transform Enterprise Phone Communications. https://www.exbogroup.com/news/bland-raises-a-40m-series-b-to-transform-enterprise-phone-communications

FahimAI. (2025, April 15). Bland AI vs Air AI: The Ultimate Call Automation Battle 2024. https://www.fahimai.com/bland-ai-vs-air-ai

FinSMEs. (2024, June 5). LiveKit Raises $22M in Series A Funding. https://www.finsmes.com/2024/06/livekit-raises-22m-in-series-a-funding.html

FinSMEs. (2025, April 11). LiveKit Raises $45M in Series B at $345M Valuation. https://www.finsmes.com/2025/04/livekit-raises-45m-in-series-b-at-a-345m-valuation.html

Five9. (n.d.). What Is Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)? Five9 FAQ. https://www.five9.com/faq/what-is-automatic-speech-recognition

Fortune Business Insights. (2024). Conversational AI Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/conversational-ai-market-109850

Fortune Business Insights. (2024). Natural Language Processing (NLP) Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/natural-language-processing-nlp-market-101933

Fundz. (2024, December 12). Vapi $20 Million series a 2024-12-12. https://www.fundz.net/fundings/vapi-funding-round-series-a-3c9698

GitHub. (n.d.). livekit/livekit: End-to-end stack for WebRTC. SFU media server and SDKs. Retrieved from https://github.com/livekit/livekit

GitHub. (n.d.). LiveKit. Retrieved from https://github.com/livekit

GitHub. (n.d.). SesameAILabs/csm. Retrieved from https://github.com/SesameAILabs/csm

GlobeNewswire. (2024, February 20). Natural Language Processing Market to Reach USD 453.3 Bn by 2032. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/02/20/2831574/0/en/Natural-Language-Processing-Market-to-Reach-USD-453-3-Bn-by-2032-Amid-Growing-Research-on-NLP-Applications-in-Healthcare-Finance-and-Customer-Service.html

GlobeNewswire. (2024, December 12). Vapi Dials-in $20M in Series A Led by Bessemer to Bring AI Voice Agents to Enterprise. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/12/12/2996317/0/en/Vapi-Dials-in-20M-in-Series-A-Led-by-Bessemer-to-Bring-AI-Voice-Agents-to-Enterprise.html/

Google Cloud. (n.d.). Conversational AI. Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/conversational-ai

Google Play Store. (2025, June 25). ElevenLabs: AI Voice Generator. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=io.elevenlabs.coreapp

Grand View Research. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market

Grand View Research. (2024). Conversational AI Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/conversational-ai-market-report

Grand View Research. (2024). Global Conversational Ai Market Size & Outlook, 2024-2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/conversational-ai-market-size/global

Grand View Research. (2024). Natural Language Processing Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/natural-language-processing-market-report

Grand View Research. (2024). Voice And Speech Recognition Market Size Report, 2030. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/voice-recognition-market

Gryphon.ai. (n.d.). What Does a Compliant Conversation Look Like? https://gryphon.ai/what-does-a-compliant-conversation-look-like/

Hamming. (n.d.). Hamming x Retell | Automated AI Voice Agent Testing & Production Call Analytics. https://hamming.ai/partners/retell

Hodgson-Coyle, N. (2024, December 13). Vapi Raises $20M in Series A. TechNews180. https://technews180.com/funding-news/vapi-raises-20m-in-series-a/

Hu, C., & Downie, A. (n.d.). What is Text to Speech? IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/text-to-speech

IBM. (n.d.). AI Compliance: What It Is, Why It Matters and How to Get Started. IBM Think. https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-compliance

IBM. (n.d.). Natural language understanding (NLU). IBM Think. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/natural-language-understanding

ICAR-IIOR. (2013, December). Improved Technology for Maximizing Production of Sesame. https://icar-iior.org.in/sites/default/files/iiorcontent/pops/sesame.pdf

Idhayam. (n.d.). Idhayam Sesame Oil. Retrieved from https://www.idhayam.com/

Infobip. (n.d.). The state of conversational AI in 2024. Infobip Blog. https://www.infobip.com/blog/conversational-ai-market

Joharder, F. (2025, April 15). Bland AI vs Air AI: The Ultimate Call Automation Battle 2024. FahimAI. https://www.fahimai.com/bland-ai-vs-air-ai

Kostanic, A. M. (2025, January 30). Polish ElevenLabs Enters 2025 With Blasting Series C and 25+ Open Positions. The Recursive. https://therecursive.com/polish-elevenlabs-series-c-funding-round-open-positions/

Kuka, V. (2025, March 18). Sesame's Conversational Speech Model Now Open-Sourced. Learn Prompting. https://learnprompting.org/blog/sesame-conversational-speech-model-open-sourced

LiveKit. (n.d.). The all-in-one Voice AI platform. Retrieved from https://livekit.io/

LiveKit. (2024, June 5). LiveKit's Series A. LiveKit Blog. https://blog.livekit.io/livekit-series-a/

LiveKit. (2025, April 11). LiveKit's Series B. LiveKit Blog. https://blog.livekit.io/livekits-series-b/

LiveKit Tutorials by OpenVidu. (n.d.). LiveKit Tutorials. Retrieved from https://livekit-tutorials.openvidu.io/

Makro PRO. (n.d.). ARO Sesame Oil 650 ml. Retrieved from https://www.makro.pro/en/p/204613-7115275665603

Marcus. (2025, April 22). What is the Bland AI Software? Technori. https://technori.com/2025/04/22022-what-is-the-bland-ai-software/marcus/

Market.us. (2024). Voice AI Agents Market Size, Trends, and Growth Analysis. https://market.us/report/voice-ai-agents-market/

MarketsandMarkets. (2025). Speech and Voice Recognition Market. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/speech-voice-recognition-market-202401714.html

Mathews, A. (2025, April 11). LiveKit Agents 1.0 Launches Alongside $45 Million Series B. AIM Research. https://aimresearch.co/ai-startups/livekit-agents-1-0-launches-alongside-45-million-series-b

Maximize Market Research. (2024). Global Speech and Voice Recognition Market. https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-speech-and-voice-recognition-market/26054/

National Center for Biotechnology Information. (2024). Low-dose sesame oral immunotherapy is safe and effective in desensitizing preschoolers. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10616424/

Nova One Advisor. (2024). AI Voice Agents In Healthcare Market Size and Research. https://www.novaoneadvisor.com/report/ai-voice-agents-in-healthcare-market

NVIDIA. (n.d.). Text-to-speech. NVIDIA Glossary. https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/text-to-speech/

OpenAI. (2025, June 26). Retell AI makes voice agent automation customizable and code-free with GPT-4o. https://openai.com/index/retell-ai/

OpenAI. (n.d.). Stories. Retrieved from https://openai.com/stories/

Open Source CEO. (n.d.). Russ d'Sa Interview. https://www.opensourceceo.com/p/russ-dsa-interview

Pega. (n.d.). What is AI orchestration? https://www.pega.com/ai-orchestration

PitchBook. (2025). Bland AI 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Funding & Investors. https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/552888-28

Play.ht. (n.d.). Bland AI Pricing. Play.ht Blog. https://play.ht/blog/bland-ai-pricing/

Potential.com. (2025). The Complete Guide to AI Voice AI Agents in 2025. https://potential.com/articles/the-complete-guide-to-ai-voice-ai-agents-in-2025

PR Newswire. (2025, June 26). Conversational AI | A $41.39 Billion Market by 2030. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/conversational-ai--a-41-39-billion-market-by-2030--how-human-like-interactions-are-reshaping-customer-engagement-and-automation--the-research-insights-302492157.html

Product Hunt. (n.d.). Retell AI - Voice AI Agent: Hire your AI call center. Retrieved from https://www.producthunt.com/products/retell-ai

Product Hunt. (2025, April 2). Vapi: Voice AI for developers. Retrieved from https://www.producthunt.com/posts/vapi

ProfileTree. (n.d.). AI Voice Market Growth: Leading Tools & Trends. https://profiletree.com/ai-voice-market-growth-leading-tools-trends/

Pure Storage. (n.d.). What Is AI Orchestration? https://www.purestorage.com/knowledge/what-is-ai-orchestration.html

Reddit. (n.d.). r/vapiai. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/vapiai/

Replicant. (n.d.). What is Natural Language Understanding (NLU)? Replicant Glossary. https://www.replicant.com/glossary/what-is-natural-language-understanding

Retell AI. (n.d.). The Best AI Voice Agent Platform. Retrieved from https://www.retellai.com/

Retell AI. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.retellai.com/about-us

Retell AI. (n.d.). B2B Guide to AI Phone Calls. Retell AI Blog. https://www.retellai.com/blog/b2b-guide-to-ai-phone-calls

Retell AI. (n.d.). Customer Contact Week 2025 Recap. Retell AI Blog. https://www.retellai.com/blog/retell-ai-ccw-2025-recap

Retell AI. (n.d.). Customer Support Use Cases. Retrieved from https://www.retellai.com/use-cases/customer-support

Retell AI. (n.d.). Customers. Retrieved from https://www.retellai.com/customers

Retell AI. (n.d.). How inbounds.com optimize and scale high-ticket call campaigns with Retell AI. Retell AI Case Studies. https://www.retellai.com/case-study/how-inbounds-com-optimize-and-scale-high-ticket-call-campaigns-with-retell-ai

Retell AI. (n.d.). Pricing. Retrieved from https://www.retellai.com/pricing

Retell AI. (n.d.). Retell AI vs. Parloa: The Real Difference in AI Phone Call Capabilities. Retell AI Blog. https://www.retellai.com/blog/retell-ai-vs-parloa-the-real-difference-in-ai-phone-call-capabilities

Reuters. (2024, December 12). Voice AI startup Vapi raises $20 million in Bessemer, Y Combinator-backed round. The Economic Times. https://m.economictimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/voice-ai-startup-vapi-raises-20-million-in-bessemer-y-combinator-backed-round/articleshow/116255535.cms

RingCentral. (n.d.). What is conversational AI? RingCentral Blog. https://www.ringcentral.com/us/en/blog/conversational-ai-conversation-intelligence/

Roots Analysis. (2024). Conversational AI Market (2nd Edition): Industry Trends and Global Forecasts, 2024-2035. https://www.rootsanalysis.com/conversational-ai-market

Sacra. (n.d.). Vapi. Retrieved from https://sacra.com/c/vapi/

Scale Venture Partners. (n.d.). Announcing our investment in Bland. https://www.scalevp.com/insights/announcing-our-investment-in-bland/

SESAME. (n.d.). Synchrotron-light for Experimental Science and Applications in the Middle East. Retrieved from https://sesame.org.jo/

Sesame. (n.d.). Bringing the computer to life. Retrieved from https://www.sesame.com/

Sesame. (n.d.). Crossing the uncanny valley of voice. Sesame Research. https://www.sesame.com/research/crossing_the_uncanny_valley_of_voice

Sesame Labs. (n.d.). Building at the intersection of AI and digital ads. Retrieved from https://www.sesamelabs.io/

Shah, K. (n.d.). How Sesame's AI Speech Model Delivers Human-Like Conversations in Real Time? Medium. https://medium.com/projectpro/how-sesames-ai-speech-model-delivers-human-like-conversations-in-real-time-1c6c4d320a67

Slang.ai. (n.d.). IVR vs. AI phone answering: What's the difference? Slang.ai Blog. https://www.slang.ai/post/ivr-vs-ai-phone-answering

Smallest.ai. (n.d.). Bland AI vs Smallest AI. Smallest.ai Blog. https://smallest.ai/blog/bland-ai-vs-smallest-ai

Smallest.ai. (2025). TTS Benchmark 2025: Smallest.ai vs ElevenLabs Report. Smallest.ai Blog. https://smallest.ai/blog/tts-benchmark-2025-smallestai-vs-elevenlabs-report

South Park Commons. (n.d.). Sesame Labs AI. Retrieved from https://www.southparkcommons.com/companies/sesame-labs

Synthflow.ai. (n.d.). Bland AI Review. Synthflow.ai Blog. https://synthflow.ai/blog/bland-ai-review

Synthflow.ai. (n.d.). Retell AI Review. Synthflow.ai Blog. https://synthflow.ai/blog/retell-ai-review

Synthflow.ai. (n.d.). Retell AI Pricing. Synthflow.ai Blog. https://synthflow.ai/blog/retell-ai-pricing

Teneo.ai. (n.d.). AI Agent Orchestration Explained: How and why? Teneo.ai Blog. https://www.teneo.ai/blog/ai-agent-orchestration-explained-how-and-why

TechCrunch. (2021, March 10). Superpowered lets you see your schedule and join meetings from the Mac menu bar. https://techcrunch.com/

TechCrunch. (2023, November 10). YC-backed productivity app Superpowered pivots to become a voice API platform for bots. https://techcrunch.com/

TechTarget. (n.d.). What is Natural Language Understanding (NLU)? Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/definition/natural-language-understanding-NLU

Tracxn. (2024). Bland - About the company. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/bland/__U3PFUE4xCNcou4lVFSJVlH5qI8FLOCBiCanU-A4pnzs

Tracxn. (2025). ElevenLabs' Funding Rounds. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/elevenlabs/__Tvkv2vcQvT5RiO80KqXicawZyFtA-r7-J533YWuiDrM

Tracxn. (2025). Retell - About the company. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/retell/__qAFnbwN7vHuMUKADfyXxnzuEXs4E8UwpfKZrjdIsu_Y

Tracxn. (2025). Vapi - About the company. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/vapi/___SoH-BLiCayDw_mTGLHOiTAhjxhsyDFWfZsDK9vzq4g

Unite.AI. (2024, December). Vapi Secures $20M Series A to Redefine Enterprise AI Voice Agents. https://www.unite.ai/vapi-secures-20m-series-a-to-redefine-enterprise-ai-voice-agents/

Unitool.ai. (n.d.). Text-to-speech, voice cloning, video translation with Eleven Labs AI online. https://unitool.ai/en/elevenlabs

Vapi. (n.d.). Vapi - Build Advanced Voice AI Agents. Retrieved from https://vapi.ai/

Vapi. (2024, December). Vapi Raises $20M to Serve Explosive Demand for Voice AI. Vapi Blog. https://vapi.ai/blog/vapi-secures-20m-to-start-the-voice-revolution-2

Video Highlight. (n.d.). To Dominate the AI Race, Don't “Start”a Company | LiveKit, Russ d'Sa. https://videohighlight.com/v/A-IsoneWlzE?mediaType=youtube&language=en&summaryType=default&summaryId=1aGhtgaeQSquxiyG6QtX&aiFormatted=false

Voiceflow. (n.d.). What is Automatic Speech Recognition? An Overview of ASR. Voiceflow Blog. https://www.voiceflow.com/blog/automatic-speech-recognition

Wheeler, K. (2025, January 31). Bland: What's Behind The AI Phone Startup's Funding of $65m. AI Magazine. https://aimagazine.com/articles/bland-whats-behind-the-ai-phone-startups-funding-of-65m

Wikipedia. (n.d.). ElevenLabs. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ElevenLabs

Wilson Sonsini. (2025, January 30). Wilson Sonsini Advises ElevenLabs on $180 Million Series C Funding. https://www.wsgr.com/en/insights/wilson-sonsini-advises-elevenlabs-on-dollar180-million-series-c-funding.html

Y Combinator. (n.d.). Bland AI: The enterprise platform for AI phone calls. Retrieved from https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/bland-ai

Y Combinator. (n.d.). Retell AI. Retrieved from https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/retell-ai

Y Combinator. (n.d.). Vapi: Voice AI for developers. Retrieved from https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/vapi

YouTube. (n.d.). Bland AI Sauce Cast. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixmoa8dUwrc

YouTube. (n.d.). Bland AI Conversational Tree. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pfgrQabO0U

YouTube. (n.d.). Vapi AI Workflows. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQTCep9Gz_Y