• All 0
  • Body 0
  • From 0
  • Subject 0
  • Group 0
Jun 4, 2025 @ 9:43 PM

RE: U.S. Auto Insurance Clicks, Leads, and Calls Monetization Market Analysis 2024

Gemini 2.5 Pro with Deep Research:

 

 

 

Derivative Auto-Insurance Lead-Monetization: Clicks, Calls & Form-Fill Leads (U.S. Market)

Executive Summary

The U.S. derivative auto-insurance lead monetization market, encompassing the annual dollar flow from end buyers for third-party clicks, calls, and form-fill leads, is estimated at $5.2 billion to $6.8 billion in 2024 (Estimate). This substantial market, often overlooked by traditional research firms, transforms raw online traffic (primarily from sources like Google and Meta) through intermediaries into higher-value, monetizable interactions for policy sellers such as carriers, agents, MGAs, insurtechs, and comparison sites.

Call-based leads, particularly warm transfers and consumer-initiated screened calls, represent the largest share of this spend, valued for their high intent and immediate engagement potential. Cost-Per-Lead (CPL) form-fills follow, offering detailed consumer data for targeted follow-ups, while Cost-Per-Click (CPC) traffic, though lower priced per unit, serves as a significant volume driver to buyer landing pages. Pricing varies widely, with CPCs ranging from under $1 to over $8, calls from $15 to $100+, and CPLs from $5 to over $100, contingent on quality, exclusivity, and source.[3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Major national carriers and large digital insurance marketplaces (intermediaries like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree's insurance arm) are the dominant end buyers, collectively channeling billions into these acquisition models.[8, 9, 10] The market's growth is propelled by carriers' renewed focus on policy expansion in a recovering profitability landscape and the persistent shift of consumer insurance shopping to online channels.[1, 11] Regulatory pressures, notably around call consent (TCPA) and authentication (STIR/SHAKEN), alongside technological advancements like AI in call handling, continue to shape operational dynamics and cost structures.[12, 13, 14]

$5.2-6.8B

Total Market Size (2024)

$15-100+

Call Price Range

97%

EverQuote YoY Growth

15-30%

Intermediary Margins

Version Log

v1.0 (June 5, 2025): Initial release of the brief.

Future updates will be logged here, reflecting new data releases (e.g., quarterly earnings, annual market reports, pricing benchmarks).

Market Evolution Timeline

·   2015-2018: Nascent stages of digital lead generation in auto insurance. Early players establish models for monetizing online traffic. Datalot, for instance, was noted for significant call volume generation during this period.

·   2019: Peak in traditional advertising spend by some major carriers, with State Farm reportedly spending $1.21 billion, indicating substantial investment in customer acquisition channels that would increasingly include digital sources.

·   2020: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandates the implementation of STIR/SHAKEN call authentication protocols by June 30, 2021, a pivotal moment for call-based lead generation aimed at combating robocalls and call spoofing.

·   Late Summer 2021: The auto insurance market begins to experience a downturn, characterized by rising claims costs and reduced carrier profitability, impacting advertising budgets and lead demand. Allstate had experimented with a larger ad budget this year.

·   2022: Major property and casualty (P&C) insurers significantly reduced advertising expenditures. GEICO cut its ad spend by approximately 38% ($800 million) to $1.28 billion. Progressive became the largest ad spender at $1.73 billion (a 7.6% decrease from 2021). Allstate's ad spend fell to $950 million (down 26.9%), and State Farm spent $1.01 billion (down from $1.07 billion in 2021). These shifts directly influenced raw traffic costs and the demand for third-party leads.

·   2023: The FCC announces a "one-to-one consent" ruling under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), aiming to close perceived loopholes in lead generation consent (this ruling was later vacated in early 2025). The top four U.S. insurance companies (Progressive, Geico, State Farm, Allstate) collectively spent $3.7 billion on advertising. The Managing General Agent (MGA) market surpassed $102 billion in written premiums, indicating growth in this alternative distribution channel which also consumes leads.

·   2024: A significant rebound in carrier advertising spend. Progressive Corp.'s advertising expenditure hit a record high of nearly $3.5 billion, an increase of 186.8% from 2023, driving substantial growth in new personal auto applications. Publicly traded lead intermediaries report strong growth: EverQuote's Q1 auto insurance vertical revenue grew 97% year-over-year (YoY) [1, 8], MediaAlpha's Q1 Property & Casualty (P&C) Transaction Value increased by 200% YoY , and LendingTree's Q1 insurance segment revenue rose by 71% YoY. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) reported $358.97 billion in total U.S. private passenger auto direct premiums written (DPW) for the year.

·   January 2025: The 11th Circuit Court vacates the FCC's "one-to-one consent" ruling, meaning the stricter interpretation of consent for telemarketing calls and texts under TCPA did not go into effect as planned.[12, 22] This provided some relief to the lead generation industry but underscored ongoing regulatory volatility.

·   Q1 2025 Financials: EverQuote reported Q1 total revenues of $166.6 million, with its auto insurance vertical contributing $152.7 million and Variable Marketing Dollars (VMD) at $46.9 million. MediaAlpha announced Q1 revenue of $264.3 million, with P&C Transaction Value reaching $407 million. LendingTree's Q1 insurance segment revenue was $146.7 million. These figures highlight the continued strength and scale of the derivative lead market.

The cyclical nature of carrier advertising spend, driven by profitability and growth objectives, directly influences the volume and cost of raw traffic available to intermediaries. Regulatory interventions, particularly concerning call consent and authentication, impose significant operational adjustments and costs, shaping the strategies of both lead generators and end buyers. The vacating of the "one-to-one consent" rule provided temporary relief but signals persistent regulatory attention on the lead generation sector.

Investor Q&A

  1. Q: How sustainable is the current growth in the auto insurance lead market, given carrier profitability cycles and recent ad spend surges?

A: The current growth phase appears robust in the near term, buoyed by healthy carrier profitability and a strong appetite for growth. For example, Mercury Insurance reported record operating income in 2024 , and Progressive emphasized growth initiatives alongside profitability. EverQuote's CEO noted in Q1 2025 that "carrier profitability remains healthy, carriers remain hungry for growth". This environment has fueled significant ad spend, such as Progressive's nearly $3.5 billion in 2024 , and strong Q1 2025 results for intermediaries like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree's insurance arm.[8, 9, 10] However, sustainability is intrinsically linked to carrier underwriting performance. A future downturn in carrier profitability, potentially driven by increased claims frequency/severity or economic pressures, could lead to ad spend pullbacks, similar to those seen in 2022-2023.[16, 18] The long-term trend towards digital customer acquisition remains a strong tailwind , but cyclicality in carrier spending is a key characteristic of this market.

  1. Q: What is the estimated total market size for U.S. derivative auto insurance leads in 2024, and how is this figure derived?

A: The estimated total market size for U.S. derivative auto insurance lead monetization (spend by end buyers) in 2024 is between$5.2 billion and $6.8 billion(Estimate). This figure is inferred due to the market's derivative nature and lack of centralized reporting. The calculation methodology involves several steps: 1.Aggregating Public Intermediary Data:Annualizing Q1 2025 revenues/transaction values for key public intermediaries (EverQuote Auto: ~$611M ; MediaAlpha P&C: ~$1.63B ; LendingTree Insurance: ~$587M ) yields a baseline of approximately $2.83 billion flowing through these major players. 2.Estimating Intermediary Market Share:Assuming these public companies represent 50-65% of the total intermediated market (a conservative estimate given other private players like SmartFinancial, Datalot, and numerous smaller entities), the total intermediated market could range from $4.35 billion ($2.83B / 0.65) to $5.66 billion ($2.83B / 0.50). 3.Cross-Referencing with Total Digital Ad Spend:The total P&C insurance digital distribution and advertising spend is estimated at $7 billion annually, growing at 15%. The derivative lead market is a significant portion of this. 4.Considering Direct Carrier Spend on Third-Party Leads:Large carriers also procure leads directly from publishers or smaller aggregators not captured in the public intermediary figures. 5.Formula Approach (Illustrative):Total Market Size = (Sum of Key Public Intermediary Revenues / Estimated Market Share of these Intermediaries) + Estimated Spend via Private Intermediaries and Direct Publisher Deals. The $5.2B to $6.8B range accounts for the known scale of major players and an estimation for the remainder of the market, aligning with the overall digital advertising landscape for P&C insurance. This market is substantial and often underestimated due to its indirect flow of funds from initial ad spend to final lead purchase.

  1. Q: How do the economics differ between Clicks, Calls (by bucket), and CPL Leads for end buyers, and which model offers the best ROI?

A: The economics vary significantly.Clicks (CPC):Generally the lowest cost per interaction. Google Ads CPC for "Finance & Insurance" averages around $3.00, with automotive-specific terms sometimes lower (e.g., "Automotive - For Sale" at $2.34).[3, 24] Facebook Ads CPC for finance/insurance lead campaigns can be around $4.57. Some affiliate network CPCs can be as low as $0.43-$0.86. Clicks bring users to the buyer's landing page; conversion to a lead or sale then depends on the buyer's site effectiveness. ROI depends on landing page conversion rates (average 2.35%, top performers 5.31% to over 10% ) and subsequent policy close rates. MediaAlpha notes clicks signify intent for a specific carrier.CPL Leads (Forms):Prices range from $5-$15 for shared, less filtered leads [4, 27] to $25-$100+ for exclusive, highly filtered leads.[5, 7] Non-standard auto leads can be as low as $3. These provide detailed consumer data for follow-up. ROI depends on contact rates and conversion rates from lead to policy.Calls (Cost-per-Call):A. Consumer-initiated raw push → IVR → buyer (90-sec billable): Lowest cost call tier. Estimated $10 - $30, Median ~$20 (Estimate). Based on proxies like uninsured callers at $20 or basic transfers. B. Consumer-initiated with human/AI screening: Mid-tier cost. Estimated $25 - $70, Median ~$45 (Estimate). Reflects pricing for insured callers or more filtered transfers.[28, 29] C. Warm Transfers (lead form outbound dial live screening announced 3-way hand-off): Highest cost call tier. Estimated $40 - $100+, Median ~$65 (Estimate). Based on premium live transfer pricing.[6, 15, 29] Calls generally have higher intent. Call-to-policy conversion rates can range from 2% (general cold outreach) to 10% or higher for well-qualified inbound calls or warm transfers.[30, 31]Best ROI:There's no universal "best ROI" model. It depends on the buyer's sales process, target demographic, and ability to convert different lead types. High-cost warm transfers may offer superior ROI for agents skilled in phone sales due to higher conversion, while sophisticated digital carriers might optimize ROI from lower-cost clicks at scale. MediaAlpha suggests calls overcome the challenge of leads not answering phones. Continuous testing and tracking are essential.

  1. Q: Who are the dominant intermediaries in this market, and what are their competitive advantages and margin structures?

A: Dominant intermediaries include publicly traded companies like EverQuote [32, 33], MediaAlpha [9, 34], and LendingTree (which owns QuoteWizard) [10, 35, 36], as well as significant private players like SmartFinancial [32, 35] and Datalot. Competitive advantages center on: 1. Technology and Data: Advanced platforms for traffic acquisition (e.g., EverQuote's ML bidding ), lead scoring, filtering, and routing. Extensive consumer data assets inform these processes. 2. Scale and Network Effects: Large networks of publishers (traffic sources) and buyers (carriers/agents) create a more efficient marketplace. 3. Diversified Product Offerings: Providing clicks, various types of calls, and CPL leads to cater to different buyer needs. 4. Compliance Expertise: Navigating complex regulations like TCPA and STIR/SHAKEN.[12, 14] Margin structures can be inferred from financial disclosures: -EverQuote:Reports Variable Marketing Dollars (VMD), which is revenue less advertising costs (traffic acquisition). VMD as a percentage of revenue was 28.1% in Q1 2025 and 29.9% in Q4 2024. This suggests a gross margin on leads/calls of around 28-30% before their own operational expenses. -MediaAlpha:Reported a Gross Margin of 15.8% and Contribution Margin (revenue less traffic acquisition costs) of 16.6% in Q1 2025. -LendingTree:Its Insurance segment reported a segment profit of $38.7 million on $146.7 million revenue in Q1 2025, a segment profit margin of 26.4%. This profit is after direct operational costs within the segment. These margins indicate the value intermediaries add by transforming raw traffic into qualified, deliverable leads/calls, covering their technology, operations, and profit.

  1. Q: What is the long-term impact of TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, and other FCC regulations on call-based lead generation?

A: These regulations are fundamentally reshaping call-based lead generation. The TCPA, with its strict rules on consent for automated calls and texts, has increased compliance burdens.[12, 22] The (now vacated) "one-to-one consent" rule, which would have required explicit consent for each specific seller, signaled the FCC's intent to curb perceived abuses in lead sharing. While its vacation provides temporary relief, the underlying regulatory scrutiny remains. Businesses must still obtain clear prior express written consent for telemarketing robocalls and texts.[38, 39] STIR/SHAKEN aims to combat illegal robocalls and caller ID spoofing by requiring voice service providers to authenticate and verify caller ID information.[14, 17] This can improve call answer rates for legitimate businesses by increasing consumer trust, but it also requires investment in technology and processes to ensure calls are properly attested (ideally "A" level attestation) to avoid being blocked or labeled as spam. Failure to comply can lead to significant penalties and operational disruption. The long-term impact is a market that favors more transparent, compliant, and technologically adept players who can manage these complexities, potentially increasing costs but also improving the quality and legitimacy of call-based leads.

  1. Q: How are AI voice agents and SMS click-to-call technologies changing the landscape for call generation and lead nurturing?

A: AI voice agents are increasingly used in insurance to enhance customer support, automate policy inquiries, streamline claims processing (like First Notice of Loss), and even provide instant quotes.[13, 40] For lead generation, AI can handle initial call screening, qualify leads 24/7, and route them efficiently, reducing operational costs and freeing human agents for complex interactions. This allows for scalability, especially during peak volumes. SMS (Short Message Service) is a high-impact channel due to its near-universal open rates (around 98%) and quick read times. For lead generation and nurturing, SMS is used for: - Click-to-Call CTAs: Embedding a clickable phone number in an SMS makes it easy for prospects to initiate a call.[41, 42] - Lead Nurturing: Sending appointment reminders, policy updates, and follow-up messages.[41, 43] - Information Delivery: Providing quick quotes or links to more information. Both technologies aim to improve engagement, response times, and conversion rates while managing costs. SMS click-to-call is a direct method for generating inbound calls from interested prospects, while AI voice agents can qualify and manage these calls more efficiently. The key is compliant usage, particularly obtaining consent for SMS marketing as per TCPA.

  1. Q: What percentage of an auto insurance carrier's typical marketing budget is allocated to third-party lead generation versus direct advertising (e.g., Google/Meta)?

A: Auto insurance carriers typically allocate between 7% to 14% of their revenue to overall marketing efforts.[44, 45] For example, WebFX suggests an average of 7-8% , while a Deloitte CMO survey cited by HawkSEM indicates 14% for the insurance sector. The precise breakdown of this budget between third-party lead generation (buying clicks, calls, leads from intermediaries) and direct advertising (managing their own campaigns on platforms like Google Ads or Meta) is not consistently reported publicly and represents a Data Void. However, inferences can be made: 1. Large carriers like Progressive ($3.5B ad spend in 2024 ) and Geico have substantial direct advertising operations. 2. The significant revenues of intermediaries like EverQuote ($152.7M in auto revenue in Q1 2025 ) and MediaAlpha ($407M P&C Transaction Value in Q1 2025 ) are funded by carriers and other end buyers, indicating a multi-billion dollar annual flow to third-party lead sources. 3. WebFX's breakdown of digital marketing spend includes "Paid Advertising" ($100-$10,000+ monthly) which would encompass both direct media buys and potentially payments to lead providers. (Estimate) It is plausible that for carriers heavily reliant on digital channels, third-party lead generation could constitute anywhere from10% to 40%of their digital marketing budget, depending on their in-house capabilities, strategic partnerships, and target market segments. Smaller carriers and many independent agencies may rely more heavily on third-party leads. This allocation is a critical area for further primary research.

  1. Q: Which end-buyer segments (carriers, large agencies, MGAs, insurtechs, comparison sites) are growing their lead spend fastest, and why?

A: Several segments show strong growth in lead spend: -Carriers:Large national carriers, after a period of focusing on profitability, are aggressively increasing ad spend to grow policies in force. Progressive's record $3.5 billion ad spend in 2024 exemplifies this trend. This directly translates to increased demand for third-party leads. -Insurtechs:Companies like Root and Lemonade are demonstrating YoY growth and are inherently digitally native, relying heavily on online customer acquisition channels, including third-party leads and direct digital advertising. Clearcover also emphasizes a tech-driven sales approach.[47, 48] -Digital Marketplaces/Aggregators (acting as buyers):Companies like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree (QuoteWizard) are themselves major buyers and processors of traffic, which they then monetize with downstream carriers and agents. Their revenue growth [8, 9, 10] indicates expanding activity. -Large Independent Agency Groups & Franchises:Groups like Goosehead are focused on expanding producer headcount and leveraging technology, which often involves providing leads to their agents. The top independent agencies handle billions in revenue and are sophisticated buyers.[50, 51] -Managing General Agents (MGAs):The MGA market exceeded $102 billion in premiums in 2023 and is growing, particularly in surplus lines. As MGAs expand and seek to write more policies, their need for efficient customer acquisition, including purchased leads, is likely increasing. The primary driver across these segments is the increasing shift of insurance shopping to digital channels and the proven scalability of third-party lead generation for acquiring customers efficiently, especially when carriers or agencies want to rapidly scale or enter new markets.

  1. Q: What are the key data voids in this market analysis, and what primary research could fill them?

A: Despite extensive analysis of available data, several key data voids remain: 1. Precise Market-Wide Unit Volumes: While dollar values can be estimated, the exact number of clicks, calls (by bucket), and CPL leads transacted across the entire U.S. market annually is not comprehensively tracked. Public companies report parts of their volume, but a market-wide figure is elusive. 2. Private Intermediary Financials: Detailed revenue, traffic acquisition costs, and margin data for major private lead generation companies (e.g., SmartFinancial, Datalot beyond anecdotal pricing) are not publicly available, making it harder to assess their market share and profitability accurately. 3. End-Buyer Spend Allocation by Delivery Model: The precise split of how much end buyers (carriers, large agencies) spend on clicks vs. calls vs. CPL leads is not generally disclosed. 4. Publisher-Level Economics: While some affiliate payouts are known , a comprehensive view of what various types of publishers (small affiliates, large content sites, comparison engines selling to intermediaries) earn from selling raw traffic or semi-qualified leads is not available. 5. Conversion Rates Across the Funnel: While some benchmarks exist for landing page or call conversion [26, 30, 31], a granular, industry-wide view of conversion rates at each step (e.g., impression-to-click, click-to-form submission, form-to-contact, contact-to-quote, quote-to-bind) for each delivery model is needed for true ROI analysis. Primary Research to Fill Voids: - Anonymous surveys of a statistically significant sample of insurance carriers, large agencies, and intermediaries regarding their lead spend, volume by type, and costs. - In-depth interviews with executives at publishing platforms, intermediary companies, and end-buyer organizations. - Analysis of aggregated, anonymized campaign data from ad networks and call tracking platforms (if accessible through partnerships). - Development of a more detailed bottom-up market model based on a wider range of private company data.

  1. Q: What are the bull, base, and bear case projections for this market through 2027, and what are the key assumptions for each?

A: Projecting the derivative auto insurance lead market requires considering growth in overall P&C digital ad spend (estimated 15% annually by EverQuote ) and the global lead generation market CAGR (17.2% across all industries ), adjusted for auto insurance specifics. Starting from a 2024 base estimate of $6.0 billion (midpoint of the $5.2B - $6.8B range): -Base Case (10-12% CAGR):Assumes continued steady shift to digital, carrier marketing budgets growing in line with or slightly above premium growth, and a stable regulatory environment post-TCPA/STIR-SHAKEN adjustments. Technology like AI continues to improve efficiency. - 2025: $6.60B - $6.72B - 2026: $7.26B - $7.53B - 2027: $7.99B - $8.43B (Projection) -Bull Case (15-18% CAGR):Assumes accelerated adoption of digital channels by consumers and agents, highly favorable carrier profitability leading to aggressive marketing spend, new innovative lead products gaining traction (e.g., more sophisticated AI-qualified calls), and a benign regulatory landscape. - 2025: $6.90B - $7.08B - 2026: $7.94B - $8.35B - 2027: $9.13B - $9.85B (Projection) -Bear Case (3-5% CAGR):Assumes an economic downturn impacting new car sales and insurance shopping, a carrier profitability crunch leading to significant ad spend pullbacks (similar to 2022-2023), and/or new restrictive regulations that significantly increase compliance costs or limit lead generation methods. - 2025: $6.18B - $6.30B - 2026: $6.37B - $6.62B - 2027: $6.56B - $6.95B (Projection) Key assumptions involve the rate of digital transformation in insurance, carrier financial health, the evolution of advertising technologies, and the regulatory climate. The vacating of the "one-to-one consent" rule leans slightly more positive for the base/bull cases in the immediate term.

The derivative auto insurance lead market is characterized by significant financial flows, with intermediaries capturing value by transforming raw traffic into qualified, monetizable customer interactions. Public company financial reports reveal substantial revenues and indicate gross margins (before their own operating and advertising expenses) in the range of approximately 15% to 30%.[8, 9, 10, 37] This margin reflects the costs of traffic acquisition, technology platforms, data analytics, and the operational efforts involved in qualifying and delivering leads. Regulatory compliance, particularly for call-based leads, represents a considerable operational cost and a potential barrier to entry, but also a source of differentiation for established players with robust systems.[12, 14] End buyers, therefore, pay a premium not just for a lead, but for a qualified and compliantly sourced potential customer.

Metrics Dashboard

Table 1: U.S. Auto-Insurance Lead Monetization Market Size & Volume (2024, Estimate)

Delivery Model

Sub-Category (for Calls)

Annual $ Flow (USD Millions) (Estimate)

Annual Unit Volume (Millions) (Estimate)

Clicks (CPC)

N/A

$600 - $900

300 - 1,500

Calls (Cost-per-Call)

A. Consumer-initiated raw push

$700 - $1,100

35 - 73

B. Consumer-initiated human/AI screened

$1,500 - $2,100

33 - 53

C. Warm Transfers

$1,000 - $1,400

15 - 23

Leads (CPL forms)

N/A

$1,400 - $2,000

28 - 133

Total

$5,200 - $6,800

See breakdown by type

Note: Ranges reflect uncertainty in average pricing and total spend allocation. Unit volumes derived by dividing estimated dollar flow by estimated median price for each category. Overlap may exist as some CPL leads convert to calls.

Table 2: Pricing Benchmarks for Auto-Insurance Leads (2024, Median & Range, Estimate)

Delivery Model

Sub-Category (for Calls)

Metric

Median Price (USD) (Estimate)

Price Range (USD) (Estimate)

Clicks

N/A

CPC

$2.50

$0.40 - $9.00 [3, 4, 24]

Calls

A. Consumer-initiated raw push (IVR, 90s billable)

Cost-per-Call

$20

$10 - $30 [4, 27]

B. Consumer-initiated human/AI screened (bill on pickup)

Cost-per-Call

$45

$25 - $70 [4, 28]

C. Warm Transfers (form -> dial -> screen -> hand-off)

Cost-per-Call

$65

$40 - $100+ [6, 29]

Leads (Forms)

N/A (Specify Shared vs. Exclusive if possible)

CPL

$20 (Shared) / $45 (Exclusive)

$3 - $100+ (Shared: $3-$25; Exclusive: $25-$100+) [5, 7]

Table 3: Top 15 End Buyers - Estimated Spend Share (2024, Estimate)

Rank

Buyer Name/Group

Buyer Type

Estimated % Spend Share of Derivative Market (Estimate)

1

Progressive Group

Carrier

15-20%

2

Berkshire Hathaway Group (GEICO)

Carrier

10-15%

3

State Farm Group

Carrier

8-12%

4

Allstate Insurance Group

Carrier

7-10%

5

MediaAlpha Marketplace Buyers

Insurtech/Aggregator

6-9%

6

EverQuote Marketplace Buyers

Insurtech/Aggregator

5-8%

7

LendingTree/QuoteWizard Buyers

Comparison/Aggregator

4-7%

8

Liberty Mutual Group

Carrier

3-5%

9

Farmers Insurance Group

Carrier

2-4%

10

USAA Group

Carrier

2-4%

11

Large Independent Agencies (e.g., Acrisure, Hub, Alliant aggregated)

Agency Group

3-6%

12

SmartFinancial Network

Aggregator/Agency

1-3%

13

Other Top 25 Carriers (e.g., Travelers, Nationwide aggregated)

Carrier

4-7%

14

Insurtechs (e.g., Root, Lemonade, Clearcover aggregated)

Insurtech

1-3%

15

Other Comparison Sites & MGAs

Comparison/MGA

1-3%

Note: Spend share is highly estimated based on overall ad budgets, NAIC market share , public intermediary revenues [8, 9, 10], and general market presence. "Marketplace Buyers" for MediaAlpha/EverQuote/LendingTree includes spend from various carriers and agents using their platforms.

Table 4: Historical Market Size & Projections (USD Billions, Total Derivative Spend, Estimate/Projection)

Year

Total Market Size ($B) (Estimate/Projection)

Growth Rate (YoY %) (Estimate/Projection)

Comment

2015

$1.8 - $2.2

N/A

Early digital adoption phase

2016

$2.1 - $2.6

~16%

Growth in digital channels

2017

$2.5 - $3.1

~19%

Increased intermediary activity

2018

$2.9 - $3.6

~16%

More carriers investing online

2019

$3.3 - $4.1

~14%

Pre-pandemic peak spending

2020

$3.5 - $4.3

~5%

Pandemic impact, initial uncertainty

2021

$4.0 - $4.9

~14%

Market rebound, carrier profitability high

2022

$3.8 - $4.6

~ -5%

Carrier ad spend pullback due to unprofitability

2023

$4.2 - $5.2

~11%

Early signs of recovery, some carriers increase spend

2024

$5.2 - $6.8

~23%

Strong rebound, significant carrier ad spend increase [8, 20]

2025 (Base)

$5.7 - $7.5

~10%

Continued digital shift, stable growth

2026 (Base)

$6.3 - $8.3

~10%

Maturing market, tech efficiencies

2027 (Base)

$6.9 - $9.1

~10%

Sustained digital reliance

2027 (Bull)

$9.1 - $9.9

N/A (vs 2024 base)

Aggressive digital adoption, favorable regulation [1, 52]

2027 (Bear)

$6.6 - $7.0

N/A (vs 2024 base)

Economic downturn, restrictive regulation

Note: Historical estimates are based on growth of public intermediaries, overall digital ad spend trends, and carrier financial cycles. Projections are illustrative based on base/bull/bear assumptions outlined in Q&A #10.

Table 5: Estimated Supply Chain Value Capture & Intermediary Margins (2024, Estimate)

Value Chain Segment

Metric

Estimated Value / % (Estimate)

Raw Traffic Cost (e.g., Google/Meta CPC/CPM)

% of Intermediary Revenue (Cost of Goods Sold for Intermediary)

70% - 85%

Publishers (Affiliates, Comparison Sites selling to Intermediaries)

Payouts as % of what Intermediary charges End Buyer

Varies widely (e.g., 50-80% of intermediary's revenue for that lead) (Data Void on precise average)

Intermediaries (Lead Exchanges, Aggregators like EverQuote, MediaAlpha)

Gross Margin % (e.g., VMD or Contribution Margin as % of Revenue)

15% - 30% [8, 9, 10, 37]

Net Margin % (after their own OpEx, Tech, Sales & Marketing)

Data Void (Varies significantly by company, not consistently public)

End Buyers (Carriers, Agents)

Cost per Bound Policy via Third-Party Leads

Highly variable (e.g., $200 - $1000+) (Depends on CPL/CPC/Call Cost & Conversion Rate)

Note: Intermediary Gross Margin is revenue less traffic acquisition costs. This margin covers their operational expenses, technology, sales & marketing, and profit. The "Raw Traffic Cost" is the primary expense for these intermediaries. Publishers' share is what intermediaries pay them for traffic/leads. End buyer cost per policy is the ultimate measure of ROI for this channel.

The financial disclosures of publicly traded intermediaries like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree offer valuable, albeit partial, insights into the market's scale and economic structure. Their reported revenues and variable marketing margins (or contribution margins) directly reflect substantial cash flows and the value captured in transforming basic online traffic into monetized leads.[8, 9, 10, 37] These margins, typically ranging from 15% to 30% of their revenue, represent the premium they earn over their traffic acquisition costs, which is then used to cover their operational, technological, and sales expenses, as well as generate profit. This underscores the significant role these intermediaries play in the value chain. The financial performance and strategic directions of these public entities often serve as indicators for the broader derivative lead monetization market.

Pricing for auto insurance leads and calls exhibits considerable variability, influenced by factors such as lead quality, exclusivity, the method of delivery (e.g., a direct warm transfer versus a raw data lead), and the original source of the traffic. For instance, CPLs can range from as low as $3 for non-standard auto leads to over $100 for highly qualified, exclusive leads.[5, 7] Similarly, calls can cost from around $15 for basic transfers to $100 or more for extensively screened and filtered calls from premium providers.[6, 15, 27] This wide pricing spectrum reflects distinct tiers of product offerings, with "exclusive" and "warm transfer" options consistently commanding higher prices due to their enhanced conversion potential. This variation allows buyers to select lead types that align with their specific conversion capabilities and ROI targets, though it also means that lower-cost leads may not always be the most cost-effective if their quality results in poor conversion rates.

Data Gaps: While public company reports provide some transparency, precise unit volumes for each delivery model across the entire market remain difficult to ascertain. Furthermore, the exact proportion of raw traffic from major platforms like Google and Meta that is channeled through these derivative models, versus being directly consumed by large advertisers, is a notable unknown. Comprehensive margin data for private intermediaries also remains largely unavailable.

Key Observations

"The U.S. derivative auto-insurance lead monetization market is estimated at $5.2 billion to $6.8 billion in 2024, with call-based interactions comprising the largest share of end-buyer spend." (Estimate)

"Progressive Corp. allocated nearly $3.5 billion to advertising in 2024, a 186.8% year-over-year increase, significantly boosting new personal auto applications and fueling demand in the derivative lead market."

"EverQuote's auto insurance vertical revenue surged 97% year-over-year in Q1 2025 to $152.7 million, while MediaAlpha's P&C Transaction Value grew 200% year-over-year in the same quarter to $407 million, signaling a robust market recovery and growth for key intermediaries." [8, 9]

"The average Cost Per Click for 'Finance & Insurance' on Google Ads is approximately $3.00 [3, 24], while exclusive auto insurance CPLs or warm transfer calls can range from $40 to over $100, reflecting significant value placed on high-intent, qualified prospects." [6, 7, 29] (Synthesized)

"Regulatory frameworks like STIR/SHAKEN for call authentication [14, 17] and ongoing TCPA compliance pressures [12, 38] are fundamentally altering operational practices, increasing costs but also potentially enhancing the quality and legitimacy of generated leads, especially calls." (Synthesized)

"The FCC's proposed 'one-to-one consent' rule under TCPA, though vacated by the 11th Circuit Court in January 2025 [12, 22], indicates continued regulatory scrutiny of lead generation data sharing and consent practices, requiring vigilance from all market participants." (Synthesized)

The substantial advertising expenditures by major carriers directly feed the top of the sales funnel, creating the raw material that intermediaries refine. The impressive revenue growth of these intermediaries demonstrates their effectiveness in monetizing this traffic. Concurrently, the wide range in lead pricing and the persistent influence of regulatory measures highlight the complex operational environment within which this market functions.

Trigger Phrases for LLM Retrieval

  • US auto insurance lead market size 2024
  • Cost per call auto insurance 2024
  • CPL auto insurance leads pricing
  • Derivative insurance lead monetization trends
  • Top auto insurance lead buyers
  • Auto insurance CPC rates US
  • TCPA impact insurance lead generation
  • FCC call labeling auto insurance
  • STIR/SHAKEN auto insurance calls
  • AI voice agents insurance leads
  • EverQuote auto lead revenue
  • MediaAlpha P&C transaction value
  • LendingTree insurance lead generation
  • Auto insurance lead supply chain
  • Intermediary margins auto insurance leads
  • Warm transfer auto insurance lead cost
  • Consumer initiated screened calls auto insurance price
  • Auto insurance lead generation forecast 2027
  • Market share auto insurance lead delivery models
  • Annual dollar flow third-party auto insurance traffic
  • Progressive advertising spend auto insurance leads
  • GEICO third-party lead costs
  • State Farm digital lead acquisition
  • Allstate online lead generation budget
  • Auto insurance lead pricing benchmarks
  • Managing General Agents auto lead buying
  • Insurtech auto lead acquisition strategies
  • Comparison sites auto insurance lead monetization
  • Cost per acquisition auto insurance digital leads

Detailed Analysis and Insights

Market Overview and Dynamics

The U.S. auto insurance lead monetization market is a derivative ecosystem where raw internet traffic, primarily sourced from major advertising platforms like Google and Meta, as well as affiliate networks, is transformed by a range of intermediaries into qualified, monetizable interactions for end buyers.[1, 2] These end buyers include insurance carriers, captive and independent agent groups, Managing General Agents (MGAs), insurtech companies, and comparison shopping websites. The market's "derivative" nature means its size and health are intrinsically linked to the advertising budgets and customer acquisition strategies of these end buyers, particularly large insurance carriers.[18, 20]

Recent years have demonstrated both the volatility and resilience of this market. Following a period of reduced advertising spend by carriers in 2022 and parts of 2023 due to profitability challenges [16, 18], 2024 witnessed a significant resurgence. Progressive's record ad spend of nearly $3.5 billion in 2024, a 186.8% increase from 2023, underscores this recovery and the renewed carrier focus on growth. This increased spending directly fuels the derivative market by increasing the volume of available traffic and the demand for qualified leads. The strong Q1 2025 financial results from key public intermediaries like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree's insurance segment further attest to the market's current strength and growth trajectory.[8, 9, 10] EverQuote, for example, highlighted that "carrier profitability remains healthy, carriers remain hungry for growth," creating a favorable backdrop.

Delivery Models: Clicks, Calls, and CPL Leads

The monetization of auto insurance traffic occurs through three primary delivery models as defined for this brief:

  1. Clicks (CPC): This model involves a straight pass-through of a consumer to the buyer's landing page or a telephone link (`tel:`) via a click on an ad or listing. CPC is often the first point of interaction after a consumer fills out an online quote form on a comparison site. The value for advertisers lies in capturing consumers who have expressed intent, particularly if the click signifies interest in a specific carrier. Google Ads CPC for "Finance & Insurance" averages around $3.00, while automotive-specific search terms can range from $2.34 to $3.39.[3, 24] Facebook Ad CPCs for related lead campaigns can be higher, around $4.57 for Finance & Insurance. Affiliate network CPCs can be lower, sometimes under $1. While the cost per click is relatively low, the ultimate ROI depends heavily on the conversion effectiveness of the buyer's landing page.
  2. Calls (Cost-per-Call): This model is highly valued for its immediacy and potential for higher conversion rates, as it connects buyers with actively engaged consumers.
    • A. Consumer-initiated raw push → IVR → buyer (90-second billable window): These are typically lower-cost calls, as the consumer is passed through an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system with minimal pre-qualification beyond basic routing. Pricing is estimated in the $10-$30 range per billable call (Estimate).[4, 27] The 90-second window is a common industry metric to ensure a baseline level of engagement before billing.
    • B. Consumer-initiated with human/AI screening before connect (bill on pickup): These calls involve a screening process, either by a human agent or AI technology, to qualify the consumer's intent and needs before connecting them to the end buyer. This adds value and thus increases the price, estimated to be in the $25-$70 range (Estimate).[4, 28, 29] Billing typically occurs when the buyer's agent picks up the call.
    • C. Warm Transfers: These are high-value calls where a lead, often generated from a CPL form, is contacted by an outbound dialer, screened live by an agent who confirms interest and gathers information, and then announced in a three-way hand-off to the end buyer.[53, 54] This model ensures high qualification and preparedness from both the consumer and the receiving agent. Prices for warm transfers are typically the highest, ranging from $40 to over $100 (Estimate).[6, 15, 29]

The Invoca Call Conversion Benchmarks Report for Financial Services (which includes insurance) indicates that 34% of calls from digital marketing are leads, and 29% of those convert on the call. This highlights the potential, though conversion varies.

  1. Leads (CPL forms): This model involves the delivery of a full data payload (consumer contact information, vehicle details, coverage needs, etc.) via API, email, or direct post to a CRM after a consumer completes an online quote request form.[56, 57] CPL leads can be exclusive (sold to only one buyer) or shared (sold to multiple buyers, typically 2-4).[7, 56] Exclusive leads command higher prices due to reduced competition. Pricing for shared leads generally ranges from $5 to $25, while exclusive leads can cost $25 to $100 or more.[5, 7, 27] Some sources indicate average CPL for automotive (paid search) around $30-$40 , while broader industry averages for "Automotive" paid CPL can be much higher, around $295, though this may include the advertiser's own media spend to generate the lead rather than just the purchase price from an intermediary.

The choice of delivery model depends on the end buyer's sales process, technological capabilities, and target ROI. Many buyers utilize a mix of these models to optimize their customer acquisition funnel.

Market Sizing and Projections

Quantifying the precise annual dollar flow from every end buyer in this derivative market is challenging due to the fragmented nature of intermediaries and the lack of centralized reporting. However, based on public company financials, industry reports on digital ad spend, and carrier marketing budget benchmarks, the total U.S. market for derivative auto-insurance lead monetization (Clicks, Calls, CPL Leads combined) is estimated to be between $5.2 billion and $6.8 billion in 2024 (Estimate). This is derived from the annualized revenues/transaction values of major public intermediaries like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and LendingTree's insurance arm, which collectively account for nearly $3 billion annually from these activities [8, 9, 10], and an estimation for the rest of the market including private intermediaries and direct publisher deals. This aligns with the broader P&C digital advertising and distribution spend, estimated at $7 billion annually by EverQuote, with a 15% annual growth rate.

Historically, this market has mirrored the cyclical nature of carrier ad spending and the secular trend of increasing online insurance shopping. The market experienced growth from 2015-2021, a contraction in 2022 as carriers pulled back on ad spend due to unprofitability , and a strong recovery and growth phase from 2023 into 2024-2025.[8, 18, 20]

Projections through 2027 indicate continued growth, contingent on several factors: - Base Case (10-12% CAGR): The market could reach $7.99 - $8.43 billion by 2027 (Projection). This assumes a continued shift to digital channels, stable carrier profitability supporting marketing budgets, and effective adaptation to regulatory changes. - Bull Case (15-18% CAGR): The market could potentially reach $9.13 - $9.85 billion by 2027 (Projection). This scenario anticipates accelerated digital adoption, sustained high carrier profitability and aggressive growth targets, impactful technological innovations in lead generation/conversion, and a favorable regulatory environment. - Bear Case (3-5% CAGR): The market might only grow to $6.56 - $6.95 billion by 2027 (Projection). This scenario considers potential economic downturns affecting insurance demand, a squeeze on carrier profitability leading to ad spend cuts, or significantly more restrictive regulations impacting lead generation volumes and costs. The overall lead generation market globally (across all industries) is projected to grow at a CAGR of 17.2% through 2035 , suggesting strong underlying momentum for digital customer acquisition methods, though the auto insurance sub-segment will have its own specific drivers.

Pricing Benchmarks

Pricing for auto insurance leads is dynamic and varies based on lead type, quality, exclusivity, source, and buyer demand. - CPC: Median estimated at $2.50, with a wide range of $0.40 (some affiliate networks ) to $9.00+ (highly competitive keywords on Google Ads [3, 24]). - Cost-per-Call: - Raw Push (IVR-qualified): Median $20, Range $10-$30 (Estimate).[4, 27] - Human/AI Screened: Median $45, Range $25-$70 (Estimate).[4, 28] - Warm Transfers: Median $65, Range $40-$100+ (Estimate).[6, 29] Datalot calls, known for quality filtering, have been cited at $75-$100 historically. - CPL (Forms): - Shared Leads: Median $20, Range $3-$25.[5, 7] - Exclusive Leads: Median $45, Range $25-$100+.[5, 7] Providers like QuoteWizard offer varied pricing based on filters and lead quality, with "Preferred Search" auto leads around $22.25 and "Premium Search" around $23.75, while non-standard auto leads can be as low as $3. SmartFinancial offers web leads from $5-$15 and call transfers from $15-$35 (or $45-$75 for live transfers depending on source/filters).[27, 29] These prices reflect the value added through filtering, qualification, and exclusivity.

Top End Buyers and Spend Share

The primary end buyers of third-party auto insurance traffic are large national carriers, major digital insurance marketplaces (which often act as aggregators for a network of agents or smaller carriers), large independent agency groups, and increasingly, well-funded insurtechs. Based on NAIC market share data for direct premiums written and reported advertising expenditures [18, 20], the largest carriers are also the largest buyers of leads, either directly or through intermediaries. The top 15 end buyers by estimated spend share in the derivative market are (Estimates): 1. Progressive Group (Carrier): Dominant due to massive ad spend and digital focus. 2. Berkshire Hathaway Group (GEICO) (Carrier): Historically a top spender, still significant.[18, 59] 3. State Farm Group (Carrier): Large market share translates to lead volume needs.[18, 21] 4. Allstate Insurance Group (Carrier): Significant presence and ad budget.[18, 21] 5. MediaAlpha Marketplace Buyers (Insurtech/Aggregator): Their large transaction value indicates substantial flow-through to various end buyers. 6. EverQuote Marketplace Buyers (Insurtech/Aggregator): Significant revenue from auto insurance vertical implies large volume sold to carriers/agents. 7. LendingTree/QuoteWizard Buyers (Comparison/Aggregator): A major marketplace connecting shoppers with insurers.[10, 36] Other significant buyers include Liberty Mutual, Farmers Insurance Group, USAA, large independent agency networks (e.g., Acrisure, Hub International [50, 51]), other top 25 carriers, and growing insurtechs like Root and Lemonade. Comparison sites like The Zebra and Insurify also play a role, often as sophisticated publishers that may also have agency arms or direct carrier integrations.[60, 61] The concentration of spend among the top few carriers and large intermediaries is notable.

Supply-Chain Split and Intermediary Margins

The auto insurance lead supply chain involves several layers where value is added and costs are incurred: 1. Raw Traffic Generation (Publishers): This is the initial source, primarily Google and Meta, where entities (including intermediaries themselves or independent publishers) bid for traffic (e.g., clicks on search ads). Costs here are foundational CPCs/CPMs. 2. Primary Publishers/Affiliates: These entities (e.g., content websites, smaller comparison sites, affiliate marketers) generate traffic and may sell raw clicks or basic leads (unfiltered form-fills, unverified calls) to larger intermediaries or directly to some end buyers. Their margin is the difference between their traffic acquisition/generation cost and their sale price. Marketcall notes affiliate payouts for CPLs ($5-$12) and Calls ($20-$50). 3. Intermediaries (Lead Exchanges, Aggregators, Marketplaces): Companies like EverQuote, MediaAlpha, and QuoteWizard (LendingTree). They buy traffic/leads from various sources, apply technology and data analytics for filtering, scoring, and qualification, and then sell these enhanced leads/calls to end buyers at a premium. - Their Traffic Acquisition Cost (TAC) is what they pay to publishers/ad networks. - Their Gross Margin (often reported as Variable Marketing Margin/Dollars or Contribution Margin) is their revenue from end buyers minus their TAC. For EverQuote, VMD as a percentage of revenue is around 28-31%.[8, 37] For MediaAlpha, Contribution Margin was 16.6% in Q1 2025. LendingTree's Insurance Segment Profit Margin was 26.4% in Q1 2025. This implies that 70-85% of an intermediary's revenue might be spent on acquiring the raw traffic/leads. The remaining 15-30% covers their operational costs (technology, call centers for screening/transfers, sales, G&A) and profit. 4. End Buyers (Carriers, Agents, etc.): They pay the final price for the click, call, or CPL lead. Their ultimate cost is measured by the Cost Per Acquisition (CPA) or Cost Per Bound Policy, which depends on the lead price and their internal conversion rates. The margin stack shows that intermediaries capture a significant portion of the value by enhancing raw traffic. However, their own operational costs to achieve this (especially for high-touch models like warm transfers or heavily filtered leads) are also substantial. There is a Data Void regarding the precise net margins of many private intermediaries and the exact share captured by initial raw traffic publishers versus the intermediaries.

Regulatory and Technological Catalysts

Regulatory Landscape: The regulatory environment, particularly concerning telemarketing and data privacy, is a major factor shaping the auto insurance lead generation market. - TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act): Remains a cornerstone of compliance. It governs how businesses can contact consumers via calls and texts, mandating prior express written consent for autodialed or prerecorded telemarketing calls/texts to wireless numbers.[38, 39] The FCC's 2023 "one-to-one consent" ruling, which would have required consent for each specific seller a lead is passed to, aimed to close the "lead generator loophole". Although this specific ruling was vacated by the 11th Circuit Court in January 2025 [12, 22], it signals ongoing intense scrutiny by regulators. Lead generators and buyers must maintain meticulous records of consent. - FCC Call Labeling & STIR/SHAKEN: To combat illegal robocalls and caller ID spoofing, the FCC has mandated STIR/SHAKEN implementation by voice service providers.[14, 17] This framework authenticates caller IDs. Calls that are not properly attested may be blocked or labeled as "Spam Likely," significantly reducing answer rates. This pressures lead generators, especially those making outbound calls or transferring calls, to ensure their calls receive high attestation levels (e.g., "A" status), adding to operational complexity and technology costs. These regulations increase the cost of compliance and favor more sophisticated players who can invest in compliant processes and technology. They also aim to improve the consumer experience and the quality of leads by reducing unwanted solicitations.

Technological Catalysts: Technology is a key enabler and disruptor in this market. - AI Voice Agents & Call Screening: Artificial intelligence is being deployed in call centers for various functions, including initial call answering, AI-driven IVRs, automated claims intake (FNOL), providing instant quotes, and screening/qualifying leads before routing them to human agents.[13, 40] This can provide 24/7 availability, reduce operational costs, and improve efficiency, especially for handling high call volumes or performing initial qualification for "Consumer-initiated with human/AI screening" call buckets. - SMS Click-to-Call and Nurturing: Text messaging is a powerful channel due to its high open rates (often over 90% ). SMS is used to send policy reminders, provide quick updates, and, importantly for lead generation, deliver clear calls-to-action (CTAs) such as "click here to call" or "reply INFO".[41, 42, 43] This facilitates direct consumer-initiated calls and effective lead nurturing sequences. - Advanced Traffic Bidding & Analytics: Intermediaries heavily leverage machine learning and data analytics to optimize traffic acquisition from sources like Google and Meta, improve lead scoring, and enhance matching logic between consumers and insurance providers. EverQuote's "Smart Campaigns" product, extending ML bidding to customers, is an example. These technologies aim to increase efficiency, improve lead quality, enhance conversion rates, and manage compliance, ultimately impacting the cost-effectiveness of different lead generation strategies.

Conclusion and Outlook

The U.S. derivative auto-insurance lead monetization market is a dynamic and substantial multi-billion dollar industry, playing a critical role in how insurance providers acquire customers in an increasingly digital landscape. In 2024, the market's value is estimated between $5.2 billion and $6.8 billion, driven by significant advertising investments from carriers and the sophisticated traffic transformation capabilities of intermediaries.

Call-based leads, particularly those involving screening or warm transfers, command the highest value due to their immediacy and higher conversion potential, though CPL forms and CPC clicks remain vital for volume and initial engagement. Pricing across these models reflects a complex interplay of lead quality, exclusivity, and sourcing methods. Large national carriers and major digital marketplaces are the primary engines of demand in this ecosystem.

The market's trajectory is shaped by several key forces. Carrier profitability cycles directly influence advertising budgets and, consequently, lead demand. The ongoing shift of consumers towards online channels for insurance research and purchase provides a persistent tailwind. Technological advancements, especially in AI and data analytics, are enabling more efficient traffic acquisition, better lead qualification, and enhanced customer engagement, offering a competitive edge to technologically adept players. However, the regulatory environment, particularly concerning TCPA and call authentication standards like STIR/SHAKEN, imposes significant compliance burdens and costs, acting as both a challenge and a potential barrier to entry that favors established, compliant operators.

Looking ahead to 2027, the market is projected to continue its growth, with base case estimates suggesting a potential size of $7 billion to over $9 billion. This growth is predicated on continued digital adoption, stable carrier financial health, and a manageable regulatory landscape. However, uncertainties such as economic shifts or more stringent regulations could moderate this outlook. Critical data voids, particularly around precise unit volumes across all delivery models market-wide and the exact allocation of carrier budgets to third-party leads, highlight areas for future research. Filling these gaps would provide an even clearer picture of this complex but vital segment of the auto insurance industry.

For stakeholders, success in this market will increasingly depend on technological sophistication, data-driven decision-making, robust compliance frameworks, and the ability to adapt to evolving consumer behaviors and carrier demands. The derivative auto-insurance lead market, while complex, will remain a cornerstone of customer acquisition for the foreseeable future.

Endnotes

Thrive Agency. "Insurance Lead Generation Services."

Profitise. "Auto Insurance Leads Analysis."

LeadSquared. "How to Generate Auto Insurance Leads for Your Business." [56]

Promodo. "8 Tactics for Auto Insurance Lead Generation."

Kobe Digital. "Leading Insurance Generation Companies."

Setshape. "Top 6 Best Insurance Lead Generation Companies in 2024."

Publift. "What Are CPM, CPC, CPA, CTR?"

Phonexa. "Performance Marketing: Understanding Cost Per Sale, Lead, Click, Action & Mille."

Salesgenie. "Find Targeted Auto Insurance Leads."

HBW Leads. "Exclusive and Qualified Auto Leads."

Nasdaq. EverQuote SEC Filings Overview.

SEC Filing Data. EverQuote, Inc. SEC Filing List.

S&P Global Market Intelligence. "Progressive's advertising expenditure hits record high in 2024." March 31, 2025.

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Progressive Corp. 10-K Filing (Older, for historical context).

Allstate Corporation. "Allstate Year-End Report 2024."

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Allstate Corp. 10-K Filing (Older, for historical context).

Reddit r/Insurance. "State Farm paying so much for celebrities..." (Anecdotal on ad spend perception).

Bankrate via Fidelity. "Insurance companies slashed ad spending in 2023."

AutoInsurance.com. "How Much Do Car Insurance Companies Spend on Ads?"

Insurance Business America. "GEICO reports largest cutback in ad spend for 2022." March 17, 2023.

AgencyChecklists.com. "NAIC 2024 Market Share: Top 25 Private Passenger Auto Insurers." March 17, 2025.

National Association of Insurance Commissioners. "NAIC Releases 2024 Market Share Data." March 3, 2025.

EverQuote, Inc. "May 2025 Investor Presentation." May 5, 2025. [1, 33, 76]

EverQuote, Inc. Investor Relations Home.

Seeking Alpha. "EverQuote, Inc. (EVER) Q1 2025 Earnings Call Transcript." May 5, 2025.

StockInsights AI. "EVERQUOTE INC Earnings Call Transcript FY24 Q4." February 25, 2025.

Invoca. "The Invoca Call Conversion Benchmarks Report for the Automotive Industry 2025."

Invoca. "The Invoca Call Conversion Benchmarks Report for the Financial Services Industry 2025."

Nimbata. "10 Best Call Tracking Software – Pros, Cons and Pricing ."

Ringba. Platform Pricing.

Marchex. Call Recordings Analysis.

Marchex. "Pick Up The Phone: Your Best Customer Is On The Line." (Forrester Paper, 2017).

Grand View Research. "Car Insurance Market Size, Share & Growth Report, 2030." (Global focus).

IBISWorld. "Automobile Insurance in the US - Market Size Statistics (2004–2030)."

WordStream. "Google Ads Benchmarks 2024: New Trends & Insights for Key Industries." May 20, 2025.

First Page Sage. "Average Cost Per Lead by Industry – 2025." May 8, 2025.

Enhencer. "Google Ads CPC Trends in 2024 & Beyond."

WordStream. "Facebook Ads Benchmarks 2024: Key Insights & New Data for Your Industry." February 14, 2025.

Verse.ai. "FCC Ruling on Lead Generation Suddenly Postponed: What You Need to Know." (Post Jan 24, 2025).

Agent CRM Blog. "TCPA Rules In Effect January 27 2025 – Insurance Agents Must Take Notice." (Note: Contains update that rules were thrown out).

Federal Communications Commission. "Stop Unwanted Robocalls and Texts." (General Guidance).

Federal Communications Commission. "Stop Unwanted Robocalls and Texts (PDF)."

Voiceflow. "AI Agent for Insurance."

Telnyx. "Handle AI insurance claims faster with voice AI." May 28, 2025.

Legal Conversion Center. "What Is A Warm Transfer?" (Definition).

Legal Conversion Center. "What Is A Warm Transfer?" (Detailed explanation).

Profitise. "What Are Insurance Leads and How To Generate Them."

LeadsRain. "How Pay Per Call Helps Get More Leads for Life Insurance Business?" March 26, 2025.

Marketcall. "Auto Insurance Affiliate Marketing Guide 2025." May 6, 2025.

Business of Apps. "Pay Per Call Affiliate Networks (2024)." May 22, 2025.

Bankrate. "Average cost of car insurance in June 2025." June 1, 2025.

Polly.co. "Auto Insurance Rates Stabilize in 2024: Q3 Polly Embedded Auto Insurance Report." October 16, 2024.

Service Direct. "Auto Insurance Leads | Exclusive Pay Per Lead Marketing."

HBW Leads. "Live Transfer Insurance Leads."

Exclusive Leads Agency. "Exclusive Auto Insurance Leads."

Smith.ai. "Warm Live Call Transfer Service with Smith.ai."

Pinnacle Financial Services. "Lead Star Marketplace."

MediaAlpha. Investor Relations Home.

MediaAlpha. "MediaAlpha Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results." April 30, 2025. [9, 93]

QuoteWizard. "Insurance Lead Pricing Details."

InsuranceLeadsGuide.com. "QuoteWizard Review."

PR Newswire. "LENDINGTREE REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2025 RESULTS." May 1, 2025.

TradingView. "LendingTree Q1 2025 Financial Results." May 1, 2025.

InsuranceLeadsGuide.com. "SmartFinancial Agents Leads Review."

Reddit r/LifeInsurance. "SmartFinancial Leads." (Anecdotal pricing).

DavidDuford.com. "Datalot Leads Review."

Reddit r/InsuranceAgent. (Anecdotal Datalot pricing history). February 25, 2025.

Convoso. "What Call Centers Need to Know About STIR/SHAKEN." April 16, 2025.

Federal Communications Commission. "Combating Spoofed Robocalls with Caller ID Authentication."

Ringy. "How to Craft Effective Insurance Text Message Scripts." August 23, 2024.

Clickatell. "Tips for successful SMS campaigns for lead generation."

Rochester Beacon. "Might AI make auto insurance rates less fair?" March 18, 2025.

Reddit r/pettyrevenge. (Anecdotal on scam calls).

Flatworld Solutions. "Outsource Car Insurance Lead Generation Services." [97]

GetVoIP. "What is Interactive Voice Response (IVR)? The Ultimate Guide." March 20, 2025.

Investing.com India. "EverQuote Q1 2025 presentation: revenue surges 83%, auto vertical leads recovery." June 5, 2025.

EverQuote, Inc. "Q1 2025 Prepared Remarks (PDF)." May 5, 2025.

Insurance Business America. "REVEALED – The Top 20 insurance brokerages by revenue." (2023 data).

OneGroup. "Top 100 Largest Brokers of U.S. Business." (2023 data based on 2022 revenue).

Insurance Business America. "$102 billion and climbing: Why MGAs are taking over the insurance game." (2023 MGA premium).

AM Best. (Leaderboard, older data for NPW).

Gallagher Re. "Global InsurTech Report - Auto & Motor." May 2025.

Clearcover. Press Releases.

ClickSend. "SMS for Insurance."

Ringy. "How to Craft Effective Insurance Text Message Scripts.".

InsuranceLeadsGuide.com. "Insurance Lead Reviews - How much do insurance leads cost?"

GrowLeady.io. "How Much Do Insurance Agents Spend On Leads?"

PRWeb. "Foureyes Releases 2025 Automotive Benchmark Report." March 24, 2025. (Automotive dealer context).

SkyQuest Technology via GlobeNewswire. "Car Insurance Market to Reach Market Valuation of $1610.13 Billion by 2031." October 16, 2024. (Global market context).

MediaAlpha. "Clicks vs. Leads vs. Calls: What You Need to Know." (2025 article).

Convoso. "Insurance Lead Generation Ideas."

WebFX. "How Much Do Insurance Companies Spend on Marketing?"

FM Engage. "How Much Do Insurance Companies Spend on Advertising?"

HawkSEM. "What Percentage of Revenue Should Be Spent on Marketing?" April 29, 2025.

SmartAsset. "Financial Advisor Marketing Budget."

1GS Digital Agency. "Insurance Agency Generates 1k+ leads monthly..." (Case study).

Canvas Business Model. "The Zebra: How It Works."

LeadIQ. Company Profile: The Zebra.

Agency Height. "Insurify Insurance Reviews."

Insurify. Company Website.

The Data Scientist. "Private Car Insurance: Top Safe Comparison Sites."

Readability.com. "Highest-rated Insurance Comparison Sites."

Goosehead Insurance. Company Website.

The Motley Fool. "Goosehead Insurance (GSHD) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript." February 24, 2025.

GAINSCO. "About GAINSCO."

GAINSCO. News/Blog. [112]

Insurance Thought Leadership. "Agentic AI Rewrites the Rules. Again."

Mercury General Corp. "Annual Report 2024."

Mordor Intelligence. "United States Motor Insurance Market." (Forecast 2025-2030).

ResearchAndMarkets.com via Business Wire. "Lead Generation Market Industry Trends and Global Forecasts to 2035." May 9, 2025. (Global, all industries).

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (Generic S-1 example, not directly used for auto insurance data).

CXL.com. "CTR Benchmarks by Industry."

WP Advanced Ads. "Click-Through Rate (CTR)."

AgencyBloc. "How to Optimize Your Insurance Website Lead Form for Conversion."

Unbounce. "Insurance Landing Pages."

Callin.io. "Cold calling script for auto insurance sales in 2025."

CloudTalk.io. "Insurance Cold Calling Scripts."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4
Views